Table 3.
Effects of high-intensity interval training on motivation for performing high intensity interval training over the next 6 months in men with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance after the ERASE trial
| Variables | Mean | SD | Adjusted between-group differencea | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 95% CI | p | d | |||
| Beneficial | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 4.3 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.0 to 1.0 | 0.065 | 0.55 |
| UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 0.9 | ||||
| Enjoyable | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 3.8 | 1.2 | 0.2 | −0.4 to 0.9 | 0.43 | 0.08 |
| UC (n = 25) | 3.7 | 0.8 | ||||
| Difficult | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 2.2 | 1.0 | −0.3 | −0.8 to 0.3 | 0.32 | −0.40 |
| UC (n = 25) | 2.6 | 1.0 | ||||
| Controllable | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 4.2 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.2 to 1.3 | 0.006 | 0.68 |
| UC (n = 25) | 3.6 | 0.9 | ||||
| Confident | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 4.0 | 1.0 | 0.4 | −0.2 to 1.0 | 0.21 | 0.21 |
| UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 1.0 | ||||
| Motivated | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 4.1 | 1.0 | 0.5 | −0.1 to 1.1 | 0.11 | 0.30 |
| UC (n = 25) | 3.8 | 0.9 | ||||
| Supported | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25) | 4.1 | 1.2 | −0.1 | −0.6 to 0.7 | 0.87 | −0.12 |
| UC (n = 25) | 4.3 | 0.8 | ||||
| Specific Plan | ||||||
| HIIT (n = 25)x | 3.7 | 1.3 | 0.9 | 0.1 to 1.8 | 0.032 | 0.67 |
| UC (n = 25) | 2.8 | 1.5 | ||||
Motivational outcomes were assessed on a 5-point scale from 1 (not at all) to 5 (very much)
aBetween-group mean difference was adjusted for marital status, employment status, and baseline value of the outcome, except for Specific Plan which was adjusted only for marital status and employment status as this outcome was not measured at baseline