Table 3.

LME model of prediction accuracies and amplitude and latency of the TRF peaks in function of speech rate for the acoustic model^a

			Rate			Rate2
			β	CI (95%)	p	β	CI (95%)	p
Prediction accuracy			7.61 × 10–3	±1.59 × 10–3	<0.001	−3.28 × 10–4	±8.41 × 10–5	<0.001
Spectrogram	p1	TRF amplitude	3.95 × 10–2	±8.00 × 10–3	<0.001	−1.45 × 10–3	±4.20 × 10–4	<0.001
		TRF latency	1.02 × 10–3	±5.35 × 10–4	<0.001	Does not improve AIC
	p2	TRF amplitude	−6.64 × 10–3	±1.77 × 10–3	<0.001	Does not improve AIC
		TRF latency	−9.81 × 10–5	±7.55 × 10–4	NS	Does not improve AIC
Acoustic edges	p1	TRF amplitude	2.33 × 10–2	±1.05 × 10–2	<0.001	−1.33 × 10–3	±5.54 × 10–4	<0.001
		TRF latency	1.05 × 10–3	±4.58 × 10–4	<0.001	Does not improve AIC
	p2	TRF amplitude	−3.92 × 10–3	±1.83 × 10–3	<0.001	Does not improve AIC
		TRF latency	2.37 × 10–3	±2.84 × 10–3	NS	Does not improve AIC

^aEvery line indicates a different model. p1, first peak; p2, second peak.