Table 1.
Quantitative comparison of the tested methods.
Method | Mean RE (↓) | Mean normalized RE (↓) | Mean SSIM (↑) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
No transformation | 41.77 | 1 | 0.431 | ||||||
Manual annotation | |||||||||
SH | 8.44 | 0.267 | 0.513 | ||||||
MLS | 6.20 | 0.257 | 0.531 | ||||||
BEBLID | w/o | 256 | 512 | w/o | 256 | 512 | w/o | 256 | 512 |
A-KAZE | |||||||||
SH | 10.87 | 10.77 | 10.88 | 0.346 | 0.350 | 0.355 | 0.526 | 0.528 | 0.528 |
MLS | 25.13 | 44.89 | 34.92 | 0.690 | 1.104 | 0.851 | 0.519 | 0.489 | 0.504 |
SH + HMA | 10.88 | 10.82 | 10.89 | 0.346 | 0.355 | 0.357 | 0.518 | 0.521 | 0.521 |
ORB 1000 | |||||||||
SH | 11.54 | 12.20 | 12.16 | 0.374 | 0.395 | 0.390 | 0.520 | 0.523 | 0.523 |
MLS | 57.17 | 46.01 | 38.98 | 1.465 | 1.214 | 1.023 | 0.480 | 0.494 | 0.503 |
SH + HMA | 11.54 | 12.21 | 12.26 | 0.374 | 0.395 | 0.391 | 0.517 | 0.520 | 0.519 |
BRISK | |||||||||
SH | 11.35 | 11.52 | 11.51 | 0.366 | 0.367 | 0.361 | 0.529 | 0.527 | 0.527 |
MLS | 51.02 | 38.41 | 30.98 | 1.240 | 1.006 | 0.820 | 0.487 | 0.494 | 0.511 |
SH + HMA | 11.36 | 12.68 | 11.52 | 0.365 | 0.380 | 0.361 | 0.521 | 0.520 | 0.520 |
MG-DHNN25 | 20.18 | 0.549 | 0.515 | ||||||
MG-DHNN fine-tuned | 13.17 | 0.408 | 0.514 |
First and second-best solution are printed in bold and italic respectively.