Table 4.
Comparing FMD% between post-procedural MBG
| FMD % | Grade 0 | Grade 1 | Grade 2 | Grade 3 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 21 | n = 23 | n = 59 | n = 47 | ||
| Myocardial blush grade | |||||
| Mean ± SD | 6.26 ± 1.38 | 8.18 ± 1.90 | 7.24 ± 2.08 | 9.47 ± 3.01 | < 0.001 |
| Range | 4–8 | 4–13 | 3–15 | 5–17.5 | |
| Grade 0 vs. grade 1 | Grade 0 vs grade 2 | Grade 0 vs grade 3 | Grade 1 vs grade 2 | Grade 1 vs grade 3 | Grade 2 vs grade 3 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Post hoc analysis | |||||
| 0.007 | 0.099 | < 0.001 | 0.101 | 0.030 | < 0.001 |
FMD% Flow-mediated dilatation percentage, PCI Percutaneous intervention, SD Standard deviation, TIMI Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction, vs versus