Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 5;298(10):102453. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.102453

Table 1.

Comparison of reported kinetic parameters of ATIC from multiple species

Species Vmax (AICAR) (U/mg) kcat_app(AICAR) (s−1) Km_app(AICAR) (μM) Vmax(FAICAR) (U/mg) kcat_app(FAICAR) (s−1) Km_app (FAICAR) (μM) Reference
Cryptococcus neoformans 6.7 ± 0.1 7.5 ± 0.1 130 ± 10 8.6 ± 0.1 7.7 ± 0.1 30 ± 1 This work
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Ade16 1.0 ± 0.1 ND 26 1.7 ± 0.4 ND ND (23)
Ade17 0.9 ± 0.1 22 2.0 ± 0.5
Homo sapiens 1.7 ± 0.6 2.9 ± 0.4 16.8 ± 1.5 2.8 ± 0.01 6.0 ± 0.8 1.4 ± 0.1 (22)
Gallus gallus 2.7 ± 0.2 ND 15.2 ± 3.6 ND ND ND (39)
Staphylococcus lugdunensis 0.5 ± 0.0 ND 32.4 ± 2.5 2.6 ± 0.5 ND 2.1 ± 0.3 (37)

Abbreviation: ND, no data.

Kinetic parameters for AICAR transformylase and IMP cyclohydrolase activities of C. neoformans ATIC, compared with published values from other species. Values are shown ± standard error.

HHS Vulnerability Disclosure