Table 2.

Planned and exploratory pairwise comparisons for Experiment 2a

Contrast	Ratio	SE	t(128.17)	p	d	95% CI
Block 1
Route:cMap	2.24	0.34	5.37	< 0.001	0.95	[0.58, 1.31]
Route:Tabletop	1.09	0.16	0.56	0.577	0.10	[− 0.25, 0.45]
Tabletop:cMap	2.06	0.31	4.82	< 0.001	0.85	[0.49, 1.21]
Block 2
Route:cMap	1.72	0.26	3.62	< 0.001	0.64	[0.28, 0.99]
Route:Tabletop	1.06	0.16	0.37	0.713	0.07	[− 0.28, 0.41]
Tabletop:cMap	1.63	0.24	3.25	0.001	0.57	[0.22, 0.93]
Block 3
Route:cMap	1.40	0.21	2.25	0.026	0.40	[0.05, 0.75]
Route:Tabletop	0.92	0.14	− 0.56	0.580	− 0.10	[− 0.44, 0.25]
Tabletop:cMap	1.52	0.23	2.80	0.006a	0.50	[0.14, 0.85]
Block 4
Route:cMap	1.28	0.19	1.64	0.102	0.29	[− 0.06, 0.64]
Route:Tabletop	0.98	0.15	− 0.10	0.918	− 0.02	[− 0.36, 0.33]
Tabletop:cMap	1.30	0.20	1.75	0.083	0.31	[− 0.04, 0.66]
Block 5
Route:cMap	1.23	0.19	1.40	0.164	0.25	[− 0.1, 0.59]
Route:Tabletop	1.03	0.15	0.20	0.843	0.04	[− 0.31, 0.38]
Tabletop:cMap	1.20	0.18	1.20	0.232	0.21	[− 0.14, 0.56]
Block 6
Route:cMap	1.17	0.18	1.06	0.290	0.19	[− 0.16, 0.53]
Route:Tabletop	0.89	0.13	− 0.13	0.453	− 0.13	[− 0.48, 0.21]
Tabletop:cMap	1.31	0.20	1.81	0.072	0.32	[− 0.03, 0.67]

N = 96. Ratios are the back-transformed difference of estimated marginal means of log values. All p values uncorrected

SE standard error, d Cohen’s d, CI confidence interval, cMap criterion map

^aDid not survive Bonferroni correction for 18 comparisons ($\alpha$ = 0.003)