Table 4. Video sources by assesment parameters.
| Academic (n) | Physician (n) | Society/Professional Organization (n) | Health-related Website (n) | Patient (n) | News (n) | p | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GQS (1–5 points) | Low quality (1or 2 points) | 0 (0%) | 6 (75%) | 9 (56.3%) | 24 (72.7%) | 7(100%) | 28 (100%) | >0.001 |
| Intermediate quality (3 points) | 0 (0%) | 1 (12.5%) | 5 (31.3%) | 8 (24.2%) | 0(0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| High quality (4–5 points) | 8 (100%) | 1 (12.5%) | 2 (12.5%) | 1 (3%) | 0(0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| JAMA score (0–4 points) | Insufficient data (1 point) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 6 (18.2%) | 2(28.6%) | 13 (46.4%) | >0.001 |
| Partially sufficient data (2 or 3 points) | 4 (50%) | 8 (100%) | 15 (93.8%) | 26 (78.8%) | 5 (71.4%) | 15 (53.6%) | ||
| Completely sufficient data (4 points) | 4 (50%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (6.3%) | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| Modified DISCERN score (0–5 points) | 1 Point | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 3 (9.1%) | 1 (14.3%) | 14 (50%) | >0.001 |
| 2 Points | 0 (0%) | 4 (50%) | 5 (31.3%) | 15 (45.5%) | 5 (71.4%) | 12 (42.9%) | ||
| 3 Points | 0 (0%) | 2 (25%) | 9 (56.3%) | 12 (36.4%) | 1 (14.3%) | 2 (7.1%) | ||
| 4 Points | 5 (62.5%) | 2 (25%) | 2 (12.5%) | 2 (6.1%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | ||
| 5 Points | 3 (37.5%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) | 1 (3%) | 0 (0%) | 0 (0%) |
Notes:
Pearson Chi-square test. GQS, Global Quality Score, JAMA, Journal of American Medical Association benchmark criteria.
Bold indicates statistical significance.