Table 4.

Evaluation of pop-up testing facilities and SARS-CoV-2 testing, differentiated by location

Variable	n		Mean (SD)		%		Statistical test result*
Location	1	2	1	2	1	2
Attitude towards facility†
Reported	379	190	4.4 (0.46)	4.3 (0.44)			3.2‡
Missing	13	5
How did you know about the facility?
Neighbours, word of mouth	114	34			29.2	18.1	8.3‡
Coincidently passing	104	32			26.7	17.0	6.6‡
Social media	75	36			19.2	19.1	0.0
Family/housemates	66	22			16.9	11.7	2.7
Community organizations	15	11			3.8	5.9	1.2
Other§	52	71			13.3	37.8	45.2‖
Missing	2	7
First time testing
Yes	268	117			68.4	60.0	4.0¶
No	117	74			29.8	37.9
Missing	7	4
Reason for testing
To be sure	197	69			51.8	35.6	13.7‖
COVID-19-related symptoms	124	95			32.6	49.0	14.5‖
Contact	44	33			11.6	17.0	3.3
Housemate with COVID-19	8	9			2.1	4.6	2.9
Other**	50	21			13.2	10.8	0.7
Missing	197	69			51.8	35.6
Future test intentions
Yes	322	144			83.6	77.0	5.8¶
Maybe	50	29			13.0	15.5
No	13	14			3.4	7.5
Missing	6
Location preference
Local testing facility	332	138			88.5	77.1	17.3‖
Standard test street	4	11			1.1	6.1
No preference	39	30			10.4	16.8
Missing	17	16
Location argument
Travel distance	261	108			74.1	63.9	5.8
No appointment needed	175	64			49.7	37.9	6.5‡
Not meeting acquaintances	10	3			2.8	1.8	0.5
Other††	46	27			13.1	16.0	0.8
Missing	40	26

*For all comparisons, χ² tests were used, except for the attitude towards the facility (through Likert scale), where t-tests were used.

†Likert scale 1-5; 3 items; α = 0.67 (n = 587).

‡P<0.01.

§E.g., GP, school, flyer.

‖P<0.001.

¶P<0.05.

**Reasons mentioned were: for holidays, GP, school, taking responsibility, high infection rates in neighbourhood, contact with vulnerable people, personal vulnerability, work-related high contact, curiosity.

††Arguments mentioned were: having no personal transport, scheduling did not work, faster, low-key, drive-in is more comfortable with bad weather.