Skip to main content
. 2022 May 24;13(5):1930–1946. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac060

TABLE 2.

The risk-of-bias assessment of the included studies assessing the effect of nutritional biomarkers on biological aging in older adults, using the ROBINS-I tool for the nonrandomized studies and the ROB 2 tool for the randomized controlled study1

First author (reference) Year Bias due to confounding Bias in selection of participants into the study Bias in classification of interventions Bias due to deviations from intended interventions Bias due to missing data Bias in measurement of outcomes Bias in selection of the reported result Overall risk of bias
ROBINS-I
 Alonso-Pedrero (28) 2020 Serious Low Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Serious
 Atzmon (29) 2002 Serious Low Serious Low Moderate Moderate Low Severe
 Bowman (30) 2012 Moderate Low Low Low Serious Low Low Serious
 Chang (31) 2020 Serious Moderate Low Moderate Low Low Low Serious
 Freitas-Simoes (32) 2019 Low Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
 García-Calzón (33) 2015 Low Low Low Moderate Low Low Low Moderate
 Gensous (34) 2020 Serious Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Handing (35) 2019 Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Moderate Moderate
 Nettleton (36) 2008 Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
 Praveen (38) 2020 Serious Low Low Low Low Low Low Moderate
 Seesen (39) 2020 Serious Low Low Moderate Low Moderate Low Serious
 Zwilling (40) 2019 Moderate Low Low Low Low Low Low Low
Year Bias due to randomization process Bias due to deviations from intended interventions Bias due to missing data Bias in measurement of outcomes Bias in selection of the reported result Overall risk of bias
ROB 2
 O'Callaghan (37) 2014 Some concerns High High Low High High
1

ROB 2, Risk of bias 2; ROBINS-I, Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies—of Interventions.