Skip to main content
. 2022 Jun 9;13(5):2002–2014. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmac065

TABLE 1.

Overview of studies evaluating a ketogenic diet in patients with MS: study design and execution1

Author (year) Study design Dietary interventions Supervision or coaching Study participants Age of study subjects, y Other notes or comments
Choi et al. (2016) (17) Randomized, parallel-group, 3-arm trial Experimental groups: KD for 6 mo, or a single cycle of a modified FMD for 7 d followed by a Mediterranean diet for 6 mo. Comparator group: control diet Nutritional coach during group-based workshops on 3 weekends 60 RRMS (20 for each group; 18/18/12 in KD/FMD/control group completed study, respectively) Adults, mean 41.3 ± 8.2 clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01538355
Swidsinski et al. (2017) (24) Interventional study (focusing on microbiome study) KD for 6 mo Nutritional coach during group-based workshops on 3 weekends 10 RRMS, 14 HC Adults, details not reported Longitudinal evaluation of colonic microbiome change under KD, without evaluation of clinical effects; HC group was not treated with KD, so the effects of KD on MS vs. HC could not be compared
Bock et al. (2018) (22) Randomized, 3-arm trial Experimental groups: adapted (by Dr Bock) KD for 6 mo, or FMD (7-d fasting followed by usual diet). Comparator group: control diet Nutritional coach 24 RRMS (11 on adapted KD, 5 on FMD, 8 controls) Adults, mean 43.1 ± 8.8 Adapted KD and CR groups were pooled for analysis due to small sample size (because of patients' dropout and loss of blood samples)
Nathan et al. (2019) (25) Single case study KD plus CR (75%). Ketogenic ratio 2.2 Diet diary, daily urine ketones 1 SPMS 60 KD as monotherapy for SPMS
Benlloch et al. (2019) (27) Prospective, mixed and quasi-experimental pilot study Isocaloric, MCT-rich diet for 4 mo Weekly telephone calls in which patients were asked about any problems in following the diet 20 RRMS, 6 SPMS, 1 PPMS Adults, mean 44.56 ± 11.27 Not genuinely ketogenic (see text for details)
Brenton et al. (2019) (3) Single-arm, open-label pilot study Modified Atkins diet for 6 mo The study dietitian provided a personalized educational session on initiation and maintenance of MAD, and provided contact information so that subjects could use her as a resource outside of study visits 20 RRMS 15–50 Study subjects largely overweight or obese; no comparator group
Lee et al. (2021) (21) Randomized, waitlist controlled, open-label study Experimental groups: MCT-based KD for 12 wk, or modified Paleolithic diet. Comparator group: usual diet. Ketogenic ratio 0.99 ± 0.47 Participants were taught the study diet by RD, who answered all diet-related questions throughout the study. RD made nutrition counseling calls to participants 2–3 d after visit 1, then weekly for 3 wk 10 SPMS, 2 PPMS, 1 PRMS, 1 RRMS; 5 on MCT-based KD, 6 on modified Paleolithic diet, 4 on usual diet 36–63 clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT01915433
Bock et al. (2022) (23) Retrospective evaluation of a randomized, 3-arm trial As described in the study of Bock et al. (2018) (22) (see above) As described in the study of Bock et al. (2018) (22) (see above) 40 RRMS (17 on adapted KD, 14 on FMD, 9 controls) Adults, mean 43.06 ± 9.7
1

CR, calorie restriction; FMD, fasting mimicking diet; HC, healthy controls; KD, ketogenic diet; MAD, modified Atkins diet; MCT, medium-chain triglyceride; MS, multiple sclerosis; PPMS, primary progressive multiple sclerosis; PRMS, progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis; RD, registered dietitian; RRMS, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SPMS, secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.