Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 12;37(10):2320–2333. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deac179

Table III.

Efficacy of implant removal procedure.*

Characteristics Standard procedure (N = 75) RemovAid™ with injection (N = 77) RemovAid™ with patch (N = 73) Total (N = 225) P-value
Primary efficacy
 Failure 0 (0) 21 (27) 10 (14) 31 (14) <0.0001
 Success 75 (100) 56 (73) 63 (86) 194 (86)
 Total 75 77 73 225
  • Combined efficacy

  • 79% (95% CI: 71.2–84.9%)

Secondary efficacy
 Failure 0 (0) 16 (21) 6 (8) 22 (10) <0.0001
 Success 75 (100) 61 (79) 67 (92) 203 (90)
 Total 75 77 73 225
Tertiary efficacy
 Failure 0 (0) 7 (9) 3 (4) 10 (4) 0.017
 Success 75 (100) 70 (91) 70 (96) 215 (96)
 Total 75 77 73 225
  • Combined efficacy

  • 93% (95% CI: 88.1–96.8%)

Data are n (%).

Primary efficacy: Implant removed without breakage for all procedures, and additionally for RemovAid™ procedures, without additional tools (besides fingers).

Secondary efficacy: Implant removed for all procedures, and additionally for RemovAid™ procedures, with no additional tools (besides fingers).

Tertiary efficacy: Implant removed for all procedures, and additionally for RemovAid™ procedures, without the use of a scalpel.

*

Two participants who received the incorrect implant removal procedure are included and analysed according to the treatment they actually received (Treated Population).

Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables.

Combined efficacy due to statistical equivalence of components.