Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 3.
Published in final edited form as: Account Res. 2006 Oct-Dec;13(4):285–309. doi: 10.1080/08989620600848645

TABLE 1.

Characteristics of Consent Forms Presenting Barriers to Withdrawal*

Notify the PI Return for Another Visit Return for Further Testing All Stipulations Combined No Barriers Total Sample
(n = 21) (n = 8) (n = 6) (n = 30) (n = 84) (n = 114)
N(%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%) N (%)
Phase of clinical Trial
 Phase I    11 (55)||     7 (88)      4 (67)     19 (63)°  77 (92)   96 (85)
 Phase II      3 (15)     0      1 (17)       3 (10)    1 (1)     4 (4)
 Phase III      6 (30)     1 (12)      1 (17)       7 (23)    6 (7)   13 (11)
Therapeutic research
 Yes    16 (76)§     6 (75)      5 (83)     23 (77)°  34 (40)   57 (50)
 No      5 (24)     2 (25)      1 (17)       7 (23)  50 (60)   57 (50)
Study Sponsorship
 In house (no sponsor)      3 (14)||     0      1 (17)       3 (10)||  54 (64)   57 (50)
 Company      5 (24)     7 (88)      3 (50)     13 (43)  13 (16)   26 (23)
 Federal funding    13 (62)     1 (12)      2 (33)     14 (47)  17 (20)   31 (27)
IRB Review Level
 Full Board    20 (95)     7 (88)      6 (100)     28 (93)  69 (82)   97 (85)
 Expedited      1 (5)     1 (12)      0       2 (7)  15 (18)   17 (15)

Notes:

*

Some PIs sponsored more than one protocol.

Since 1 protocol was not a clinical trial, total for analysis was one less than N for notify the PI and further testing.

Chi-Square analyses were only performed on Notify the PI and the set of All Withdrawal Stipulations Combined, and not performed on ‘Return for another visit’ or ‘Return for further testing’ because of small numbers.

§

P < 0.05,

°

P < 0.005,

||

P < 0.0005.