Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 3;24:227. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02914-7

Table 3.

Correct detection rates for test data

Intact Non-intact Total
Erosion
 PIP-IP 916/921 (99.5%) 99/109 (90.8%) 1015/1030 (98.5%)
 MCP 896/900 (99.6%) 108/130 (83.1%) 1004/1030 (97.5%)
 CMC-M 289/291 (99.3%) 113/121 (93.4%) 402/412 (97.6%)
 Wrist 393/393 (100.0%) 415/431 (96.3%) 806/824 (98.1%)
 All joints 2494/2505 (99.6%) 735/791 (92.9%) 3229/3296 (98.0%)
JSN
 PIP 508/513 (99.0%) 285/311 (91.6%) 793/824 (96.2%)
 MCP 782/796 (98.2%) 203/234 (86.8%) 985/1030 (95.6%)
 CMC 304/305 (99.7%) 309/313 (98.7%) 613/618 (99.2%)
 Wrist 197/197 (100.0%) 420/421 (99.8%) 617/618 (99.8%)
 All joints 1791/1811 (98.9%) 1217/1279 (95.2%) 3008/3090 (97.3%)

Correct detection rates for intact (SHS = 0) joints, non-intact (SHS ≥ 1) joints, and the total for each target joint are shown. The numbers represent the correct detection/total cases (correct detection rates %). In erosion, “Wrist” represents the navicular, the lunate, the radius, and the ulna. In JSN, “Wrist” represents the multangular-navicular, the capitate-navicular-lunate, and the radiocarpal joint

GT ground-truth, PIP proximal interphalangeal, IP interphalangeal, MCP metacarpophalangeal, CMC-M carpometacarpal joint of the thumb and multangular, JSN joint space narrowing, CMC carpometacarpal