Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 1;19(10):1677–1686. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202110-1174OC

Table 1.

Characteristics of 151 survey respondents with long-term oxygen therapy

Characteristic All Respondents (n = 151) Worse Quality of Life (n = 72) Better Quality of Life (n = 79)
Age, mean (SD), yr 74.7 (8.6) 74.5 (9.0) 74.8 (8.4)
Women, n (%) 89 (58.9%) 41 (57.0%) 48 (60.8%)
BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 26.9 (7.2) 25.7 (7.1) 27.9 (7.2)
Cause for starting LTOT (grouped), n (%)
 Airway disease 113 (74.8%) 53 (73.6%) 60 (75.9%)
 Parenchymal lung disease 20 (13.2%) 14 (19.4%) 6 (7.6%)
 Other 17 (11.3%) 5 (6.9%) 12 (15.2%)
 Missing 1 (0.67%) 0 (0%) 1 (1.3%)
Living situation, n (%)
 House 65 (43.0%) 27 (37.5%) 38 (48.1%)
 Apartment 76 (50.3%) 38 (52.8%) 38 (48.1%)
 Assisted care facility 10 (6.6%) 7 (9.7%) 3 (3.8%)
 Missing 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Social situation, n (%)
 Cohabitating partner 91 (60.7%) 44 (61.1%) 47 (59.5%)
 Non-cohabitating partner 8 (5.3%) 2 (2.8%) 6 (7.6%)
 No partner 51 (34.0%) 25 (34.7%) 26 (32.9%)
 Missing 1 (0.67%) 1 (1.4%) 0 (0%)
Oxygen equipment, n (%)
 Stationary oxygen concentrator 140 (92.7%) 68 (94.4%) 72 (91.1%)
 Portable oxygen concentrator 111 (73.5%) 53 (73.6%) 58 (73.4%)
 Compressed gas cylinders 10 (6.6%) 4 (5.6%) 6 (7.6%)
 Liquid oxygen 9 (6.0%) 1 (1.4%) 8 (10.1%)
 Nasal cannula 147 (97.4%) 72 (100.0%) 75 (94.9%)
 Oxygen mask 24 (15.9%) 7 (9.7%) 17 (21.5%)
 High flow cannula 7 (4.6%) 2 (2.8%) 5 (6.3%)
Years since LTOT start, median (IQR) 2.2 (1.0–3.8) 2.4 (1.2–3.5) 1.7 (0.9–4.4)
Reported oxygen prescription, median (IQR)
 Time (h/d) 24 (16–24) 24 (16–24) 21.5 (16–24)
 Flow rate (l/min) 2 (1.1–3) 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1–2.75)
 Variable flow, daytime, L/min 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1.5–3)
 Variable flow, nighttime, L/min 2 (1.5–2.75) 2 (1.5–2.5) 2 (1.5–3)
 Variable flow, effort, L/min 3 (2–4) 2.25 (1.75–3.5) 3 (2.5–4)
Reported oxygen use, median (IQR)
 Time, h/d 24 (17–24) 24 (20–24) 23 (16–24)
 Flow rate, L/min 2 (1.35–3) 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1–3)
 Variable flow, daytime, L/min 2 (1.3–2.875) 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1–2.5)
 Variable flow, nighttime, L/min 2 (1.5–2.75) 2 (1.5–3) 2 (1–2.5)
 Variable flow, effort, L/min 3 (2–4) 2.5 (2–4) 3 (2–4)
 Oxygen use during nighttime 145 (96.0%) 68 (94.4%) 77 (97.5%)
Sleep quality, n (%)
 Very good 22 (14.6%) 8 (11.1%) 14 (17.7%)
 Good 51 (33.8%) 20 (27.7%) 31 (39.2%)
 Fairly good 57 (37.7%) 27 (37.5%) 30 (38.0%)
 Poor 17 (11.3%) 14 (19.4%) 3 (3.8%)
 Very poor 4 (2.6%) 3 (4.2%) 1 (1.3%)
 Missing 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Sleep time, median (IQR), h 7 (6–8) 7 (6–8) 7 (6–8)
Smoking status, n (%)
 Never-smoker 23 (15.5%) 11 (15.3%) 12 (15.2%)
 Ever-Smoker 124 (82.1%) 60 (83.3%) 65 (82.3%)
 Missing 4 (2.6%) 1 (1.4%) 3 (3.8%)
Alcohol, median (IQR), weekly standard units 0 (0–1.8) 0 (0–0.25) 0 (0–3)
HrQoL, mean (SD)
 CAT 24.0 (6.7) 29.6 (3.4) 18.9 (4.5)
 EQ-VAS 40.0 (19.8) 32.2 (16.4) 48.4 (19.7)
 SF-12 MCS 40.9 (13.2) 34.5 (12.7) 46.9 (10.7)
 SF-12 PCS 27.0 (8.5) 25.0 (7.4) 28.8 (9.0)

Definition of abbreviations: BMI = body mass index; CAT = chronic obstructive pulmonary disease assessment test; EQ-VAS = EuroQoL visual analogue scale; HrQoL = health-related quality of life; IQR = interquartile range; LTOT = long-term oxygen therapy; MCS = mental component summary; PCS = physical component summary; SD = standard deviation; SF-12 = short form-12.

Characteristics of patients with better and worse HrQoL were compared using Student’s t test (continuous variables with normal distributions), the Mann-Whitney U test (ordinal and continuous variables with nonnormal distributions), and Fisher exact test (categorical variables).