Table 2.
Study (year) | ROB | Applicability | Overall | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Participants | Predictors | Outcome | Analysis | Participants | Predictors | Outcome | ROB | Applicability | ||
Cervix | Perez et al. (1999) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | + | + | + |
Barillot et al. (2000) | + | + | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
Chen et al. (2000) | ? | ? | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Chen et al. (2004) | ? | ? | ? | + | + | + | – | + | + | |
Wang et al. (2004) | ? | ? | + | + | + | – | + | + | + | |
Saibishkumar et al. (2006) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Noda et al. (2007) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Chen et al. (2009) | ? | ? | ? | + | + | + | – | + | + | |
Chen et al. (2010) | ? | ? | ? | + | + | – | – | + | + | |
Kang et al. (2010) | ? | + | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Huang et al. (2013) | – | ? | ? | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Kim et al. (2013) | – | – | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Kim et al. (2015) | ? | ? | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Ujaimi et al. (2017) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Zhen et al. (2017)* | + | ? | + | N.A. | ? | ? | ? | N.A. | ? | |
Chen et al. (2018)* | + | ? | + | N.A. | – | + | – | N.A. | + | |
Prostate | Merrick et al. (2003) | – | ? | ? | + | + | + | + | + | + |
Bittner et al. (2008) | – | ? | – | + | + | – | + | + | + | |
Zelefsky et al. (2008) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Shiraishi et al. (2011) | ? | ? | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Keyes et al. (2012) | – | ? | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
Buckstein et al. (2013) | – | ? | + | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Price et al. (2013) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Shiraishi et al. (2013) | ? | ? | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Kang et al. (2015) | ? | ? | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
Katayama et al. (2016) | – | + | ? | + | – | – | – | + | – | |
Kragelj et al. (2017) | ? | ? | + | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
Tanaka et al. (2018) | ? | ? | ? | + | – | + | – | + | + | |
Ling et al. (2019) | – | – | + | + | – | – | + | + | + | |
Rectum | Rijkmans et al. (2019) | + | – | + | + | + | – | + | + | + |
ROB – risk of bias; N.A. – not applicable; * non-regression modeling technique was used, for which PROBAST could not be applied on all domains; + indicates low ROB/low concern regarding applicability; – indicates high ROB/high concern regarding applicability; ? indicates unclear ROB/unclear concern regarding applicability