Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;14(4):411–422. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.119427

Table 2.

Risk of bias and applicability concern of the prediction models for brachytherapy-induced rectal toxicity in patients with pelvic cancers

Study (year) ROB Applicability Overall
Participants Predictors Outcome Analysis Participants Predictors Outcome ROB Applicability
Cervix Perez et al. (1999) ? ? ? + + + +
Barillot et al. (2000) + + + + + + +
Chen et al. (2000) ? ? + + + + +
Chen et al. (2004) ? ? ? + + + + +
Wang et al. (2004) ? ? + + + + + +
Saibishkumar et al. (2006) ? ? ? + +
Noda et al. (2007) ? ? ? + +
Chen et al. (2009) ? ? ? + + + + +
Chen et al. (2010) ? ? ? + + + +
Kang et al. (2010) ? + + + + + +
Huang et al. (2013) ? ? + + + +
Kim et al. (2013) ? + +
Kim et al. (2015) ? ? + + +
Ujaimi et al. (2017) ? ? ? + +
Zhen et al. (2017)* + ? + N.A. ? ? ? N.A. ?
Chen et al. (2018)* + ? + N.A. + N.A. +
Prostate Merrick et al. (2003) ? ? + + + + + +
Bittner et al. (2008) ? + + + + +
Zelefsky et al. (2008) ? ? ? + +
Shiraishi et al. (2011) ? ? + + +
Keyes et al. (2012) ? + + + + +
Buckstein et al. (2013) ? + + +
Price et al. (2013) ? ? ? + + + +
Shiraishi et al. (2013) ? ? + + + + +
Kang et al. (2015) ? ? + + + + +
Katayama et al. (2016) + ? + +
Kragelj et al. (2017) ? ? + + + + +
Tanaka et al. (2018) ? ? ? + + + +
Ling et al. (2019) + + + + +
Rectum Rijkmans et al. (2019) + + + + + + +

ROB – risk of bias; N.A. – not applicable; * non-regression modeling technique was used, for which PROBAST could not be applied on all domains; + indicates low ROB/low concern regarding applicability; – indicates high ROB/high concern regarding applicability; ? indicates unclear ROB/unclear concern regarding applicability