Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 31;14(4):311–320. doi: 10.5114/jcb.2022.119451

Table 4.

Relevant literature and the present study. Comparison with previous studies on definitive radiation therapy for adenocarcinoma/adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix

Authors
(year)
Study design No. Stage I-II/III-IV IGBT Median
follow-up (months)
LC OS PFS AE grade ≥ 3
Niibe Y
(2010)
Multi, Retro 61 0%/100%
(stage III)
Non-IGBT N.R. 3 y: 60%,
5 y: 36%
3 y: 24%,
5 y: 20%
3 y: 17%,
5 y: 13%
13.1%
(grade ≥ 2)
Rose PG
(2014)
Pooled, Retro 182 75%/25% Non-IGBT N.R. N.R. 3 y: 49%,
5 y: 45%
N.R. N.R.
Chen JL
(2014)
Single, Retro 35 74%/26% Non-IGBT 59 3 y: 64%,
5 y: 64%
3 y: 66%,
5 y: 45%
3 y: 39%,
5 y: 30%
22.8%
Yin KC
(2018)
Single, PSM, Retro 30 67%/33% Non-IGBT 40 3 y: 70%,
5 y: 70%
3 y: 63%,
5 y: 46%
3 y: 43%,
5 y: 43%
3.3%
Miyasaka Y
(2020)
Multi, Retro 71 51%/49% Mixed 37 3 y: 64%,
5 y: 62%
3 y: 63%,
5 y: 50%
3 y: 40%,
5 y: 36%
N.R.
Zhang J
(2020)
Pooled, PSM, Retro 331 66%/34% Mixed 55 N.R. 3 y: 52%,
5 y: 43%
N.R. N.R.
Present study Multi, Retro 36 25%/75% IGBT 39 3 y: 69% 3 y: 68% 3 y: 44% 5.6%

IGBT – image-guided brachytherapy; LC – local control; OS – overall survival; PFS – progression-free survival; AE – adverse event; Multi – multi-institutional study; Retro – retrospective study; N.R. – not reported; Pooled – pooled analysis; Single – single-institutional study; PSM – propensity score matching