Kim 2006.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomisation: randomised, no other details
Blinding: open‐label Duration: 12 weeks |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM‐IV criteria for schizophrenia
N = 14
Age: 18–55 years
Sex: male Setting: outpatients History: treated with a second‐generation antipsychotic for at least 8 weeks, with the same dose for at least 4 weeks; clinically stable; and to have a BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2, or ≥ 27 kg/m2 plus adult treatment; panel III hyperlipidaemia or hypertriglyceridaemia Excluded: diagnosis of DSM‐IV substance abuse within the last month or DSM‐IV substance dependence within the last 6 months; cannabis use more than once weekly; Calgary Depression Rating Scale (CDS) total score > 7; suicidality or hospitalisation for depression in prior 6 months; the use of any medication known to alter weight or appetite; and pregnant or nursing women |
|
Interventions |
Both groups on olanzapine, 10 mg/d, increasing but not to exceed 20 mg/d |
|
Outcomes |
Able to use:
|
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomisation methods not reported |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | High risk | Allocation concealment not indicated; open‐label study |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | High risk | Open‐label |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Weight outcomes unlikely to be biased by blinding |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Data were analysed in accordance with ITT methodology |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | Primary outcome measure was reported |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious bias |