Poyurovsky 2007.
Study characteristics | ||
Methods | Randomisation: randomised, random numbers table Blinding: double‐blind, no other details Duration: 6 weeks Country: Israel |
|
Participants | Diagnosis: DSM‐IV schizophrenia or schizophreniform disorder N = 59 Age: 29.9 years Sex: male and female Setting: inpatients History: participants had none or < 4 weeks of antipsychotic drug exposure and a recommendation for olanzapine treatment by the treating physician. Excluded: major mood disorder, aggressive or suicidal behaviour, medical illness that could affect body weight (e.g. diabetes mellitus and hypothyroidism) and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) |
|
Interventions |
|
|
Outcomes |
Able to use:
Unable to use:
|
|
Notes | None of the participants were placed on a special diet or physical exercise programme for weight reduction. 69.5% study completers |
|
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | Quote: "The participants were allocated according to entries on a table of random numbers to receive..." Pg 442 |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Information is unavailable |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "All the study medications were dispensed in identical capsules, and patients received two capsules per day." Pg 443 |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "All weight measurements were performed by a research assistant blinded to the patient's treatment assignment." Pg 443 |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Quote: "The primary statistical analysis was by intention to treat and included all randomised participants." Pg 443 Quote: "Nine patients in each group discontinued the study medication..." Pg 444 Comment: > 90% of the data was analysed with ~70% study completers using an ITT analysis |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Unclear risk | Study protocol is unavailable |
Other bias | Low risk | No obvious bias |