Table 4.
The Direct Effect of the Research Paths and Research Model Hypothesis Analysis
| DV | IV | Std.Est. | S.E. | Est./S.E. | P-value | R2 | Hypo and Path | Remarks |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SWB | TM | 0.211 | 0.072 | 2.923 | 0.003 | 0.476 | H1: TM → SWB | Support |
| EI | 0.248 | 0.076 | 3.269 | 0.001 | H2b: EI → SWB | Support | ||
| WFB | 0.413 | 0.074 | 5.561 | *** | H3b: WFB → SWB | Support | ||
| EI | TM | 0.470 | 0.066 | 7.146 | *** | 0.238 | H2a: TM → EI | Support |
| WFB | TM | 0.199 | 0.076 | 2.607 | 0.009 | 0.195 | H3a: TM → WFB | Support |
| EI | 0.300 | 0.076 | 3.918 | *** | H4: EI → WFB | Support |
Note: ***p < 0.001.
Abbreviations: SWB, subjective well-being; TM, trait mindfulness; EI, emotional intelligence; WFB, work–family balance.