Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep;33(9):1767–1777. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2022020135

Table 2.

Risk of outcomes comparing rosuvastatin use versus atorvastatin use, overall and across eGFR levels

Outcome Unweighted No. of Events/N IPTW-IR (95% CI), per 1000 PYs IPTW-IRD (95% CI), per 1000 PYs P for Heterogeneitya IPTW-HR (95% CI) P for Heterogeneitya
Rosuvastatin Atorvastatin Rosuvastatin Atorvastatin
Hematuria
 Overall 5178/152,101 22,604/795,799 9.2 (8.9 to 9.5) 8.6 (8.4 to 8.7) 0.63 (0.31 to 0.95) 1.08 (1.04 to 1.11)
 eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)
  ≥60 4138/130,506 18,215/687,461 8.4 (8.1 to 8.7) 7.9 (7.8 to 8.0) 0.53 (0.20 to 0.86) 0.42 1.07 (1.03 to 1.11) 0.40
  30–59 971/20,427 4115/102,392 13.7 (12.7 to 14.7) 12.7 (12.3 to 13.1) 0.98 (−0.09 to 2.05) 1.09 (1.01 to 1.18)
  <30 69/1168 274/5946 23.1 (17.6 to 30.9) 18.8 (16.7 to 21.3) 4.25 (−2.58 to 11.07) 1.22 (0.90 to 1.64)
Proteinuria
 Overall 1776/152,101 7495/795,799 3.2 (3.1 to 3.4) 2.8 (2.7 to 2.8) 0.47 (0.28 to 0.66) 1.17 (1.10 to 1.25)
 eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)
  ≥60 1155/130,506 4971/687,461 2.4 (2.3 to 2.6) 2.1 (2.0 to 2.2) 0.33 (0.15 to 0.52) 0.16 1.16 (1.07 to 1.25) 0.74
  30–59 552/20,427 2225/102,392 7.8 (7.1 to 8.6) 6.7 (6.4 to 7.0) 1.12 (0.32 to 1.93) 1.18 (1.06 to 1.31)
  <30 69/1168 299/5946 22.6 (17.1 to 30.6) 20.5 (18.3 to 23.1) 2.10 (−4.83 to 9.03) 1.10 (0.81 to 1.50)
Urinary tract infection (negative control outcome)
 Overall 11,829/152,101 55,213/795,799 21.9 (21.4 to 22.4) 21.5 (21.3 to 21.7) 0.42 (−0.08 to 0.93) 1.02 (1.00 to 1.04)
 eGFR (ml/min per 1.73 m2)
  ≥60 8962/130,506 41,667/687,461 19.0 (18.6 to 19.5) 18.5 (18.3 to 18.7) 0.50 (−0.001 to 1.0) 0.32 1.03 (1.00 to 1.05) 0.31
  30–59 2676/20,427 12,579/102,392 39.9 (38.2 to 41.8) 40.8 (40.1 to 41.5) −0.86 (−2.8 to 1.1) 0.99 (0.94 to 1.03)
  <30 191/1168 967/5946 68.2 (57.7 to 81.0) 72.0 (67.4 to 76.9) −3.8 (−16.2 to 8.7) 0.94 (0.78 to 1.12)

IPTW-HRs were from stratified Cox proportional hazards regression models by cohort. IPTW, inverse-probability of treatment weight; IR, incidence rate; PYs, person-years; IRD, incidence rate difference.

a

P for heterogeneity in IRD across eGFR subgroups was estimated using fixed effects meta-analysis and P for heterogeneity in HR was estimated using stratified Cox models with interaction term between rosuvastatin use and eGFR category.