Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;14:2933–2944. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S377784

Table 3.

Multivariate Cox Regression Analysis for OS

Multivariate Analysis
Model 1 Model 2
Characteristics HR (95% CI) p- value HR (95% CI) p- value
∆CEA% < −30.29% vs > −30.29% 0.558 (0.259–1.201) 0.136
∆CA199% < 20.30% vs > 20.30% 0.468 (0.220–0.994) 0.048
STBC score 0 vs 1–2 0.204 (0.078–0.532) 0.001
ypT staging (0–2) vs (3–4) 0.420 (0.182–0.970) 0.042 0.426 (0.184–0.986) 0.046
ypN staging Negative vs positive 0.680 (0.315–1.465) 0.324 0.574 (0.269–1.226) 0.152

Notes: Model 1, ∆CEA% and ∆CA199% were included in multivariate analysis, STBC score was not. Model 2: STBC score was in multivariate analysis, ∆CEA% and ∆CA199% were not.

Abbreviations: yp, pathologic status after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy; ∆CEA %, (post-chemoradiotherapy CEA – pre-chemoradiotherapy CEA)/pre-chemoradiotherapy CEA*100%; ∆CA199 %, (post-chemoradiotherapy CA199 – pre-chemoradiotherapy CA199)/ pre-chemoradiotherapy CA199*100%; STBC score, serum tumor biomarkers change score.