|
Ahmed (2007)
|
Experimental economics |
To study how group identity, social distance, and intergroup bias may affect economic decision-making. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (cooperate, stag, and dovish) |
|
Andreoni and Petri (2008)
|
Experimental economics |
To explore the returns to beauty and gender. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of discrimination (average contribution and average payoff) |
|
Ben-Ner et al. (2009)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate the existence and relative strength of favoritism for in-group versus outgroup along with multiple identity categories. |
Discrimination |
Labor market |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (giving, sharing the office, work, and commute). |
|
Bjorvatn and Tungodden (2015)
|
Experimental economics |
To study the impact of social identity on confidence and the role of disability identity in shaping confidence, preferences, and performance. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of (self) stereotyping (performance, confidence, risk-, time-, socialand competitiveness preferences) |
|
Bohnet et al. (2016)
|
Experimental economics |
To examine whether evaluating candidates jointly rather than separately leads to individual performance playing a more important role than group stereotypes. |
Stereotypes |
Labor market |
Labor market application that influences the phenomenon |
Experiences of stereotyping and discrimination (candidates’ performance and evaluators’ choices) |
|
Candelo et al. (2017)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate how identity and social exclusion influence individual contributions to fund local public goods. |
Social exclusion |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on social exclusion |
Public policy and social change (social identity, social exclusion, and amount contributed) |
|
Carlin and Love (2013)
|
Experimental economics |
To advance a political theory of trust and reciprocity by testing dual-process strategies based on social identity and cognitive heuristics. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of discrimination (trust, reciprocity, partisanship, and amount sent) |
|
Chen et al. (2014)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate the effects of highlighting a common versus fragmenting identity on coordination and cooperation in a series of prisoner’s dilemmas and minimum effort games with varying incentives. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Public policy and social change (priming fragmenting identity versus common organization identity, coordination, and cooperation) |
|
Furuya (2002)
|
Theoretical model |
To characterize an economic mechanism through which stigma could give rise to a socially inefficient equilibrium. |
Stigmatization |
Labor market |
Direct study on stigmatization |
Public policy and social change (welfare analysis -the marginal effect of social acceptance on social deviance and the size of the social cost relative to the possible private damage) |
|
Grimm et al. (2017)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate how and why people discriminate among different groups, including their own group and multiple outgroups. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (transfers and beliefs) |
|
Grosskopf and Pearce (2017)
|
Experimental economics |
To examine the discriminatory motives of the poorest people in England. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (amount is given and closeness) |
|
Güth et al. (2009)
|
Experimental economics |
To test whether the positive effect on the self from common group identity increased other-regarding behavior towards in-group members. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (choices and beliefs -first and second-order- about average amount transferred) |
|
Halevy et al. (2012)
|
Experimental economics |
To distinguish whether individual participation in intergroup conflict can be motivated by “in-group love”, “outgroup hate”, or both. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Public policy and social change (universal defection, intragroup cooperation, or intergroup competition - average amount kept or contributed-) |
|
Heinrich (2013)
|
Theoretical model |
To get a picture of the forces driving negative stereotypes and to deduce policies to reduce them. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes and discrimination |
Public policy and social change (average evaluation of group members by decision-makers and effects of affirmative action on in groupoutgroup and between-groups discrimination) |
|
Jenkins et al. (2018)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate how warmth and competence stereotypes influence social valuation and to what degree it is possible to predict people’s treatment of members of a wide variety of social groups. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of discrimination (social perception -warmth and competence stereotypes- and social valuation -equity preferences- according to the amount given) |
|
Meleady and Seger (2017)
|
Experimental economics |
To examine the effect of imagined contact on cooperative behavior towards outgroup members. |
Prejudices |
Behavioral economics |
Behavioral intervention/ application that influences the phenomenon |
Experiences of discrimination (cooperative and competitive choices and trust) |
|
Ouazad and Page (2013)
|
Experimental economics |
To estimate students’ perceptions of grading discrimination. |
Discrimination |
Education sector |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (students investment choice -number of questions bought- and grading practices -teacher and external examiner-) |
|
Pondorfer et al. (2017)
|
Experimental economics |
To examine gender differences in stereotypes about risk preferences of men and women. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of stereotyping (risk preferences -own gamble choice and predictions of others’ gamble choices) |
|
Saccardo (2015)
|
Experimental economics |
To present evidence of prejudice-based ethnic discrimination. |
Prejudice |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on prejudices and discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (prosocial and welfare-maximizing choices -payoffs- sending a false -a lie- or a truthful message, reject offers, beliefs about amount offered by subjects with different ethnicity names) |
|
Schwartzstein (2014)
|
Theoretical model |
To draw out the consequences of selective attention in a model of an agent who makes forecasts based on available information. |
Heuristics and biases |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on heuristics and biases |
Experiences of stereotyping and discrimination (systematically biased stereotypes and beliefs and limiting forecast) |
|
Shcherbakov (2016)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate stigma against individuals with ASD in the workplace. |
Stigmatization |
Labor market |
Direct study on stigmatization |
Experiences of discrimination (demographic questions, salary increase -willingness to accept-, social distance scale, knowledge of autism spectrum disorder [ASD], and taboo trade-off) |
|
Stanley et al. (2011)
|
Experimental economics |
To investigate the relationship between implicit race attitude and social trust. |
Heuristics and biases |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on heuristics and/o biases |
Relational performance (trustworthiness ratings, economic offers, and IAT scores). |
|
Tanaka and Camerer (2016)
|
Experimental economics |
To measure the stereotyped attitudes of one group toward another. |
Stereotypes |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on stereotypes |
Experiences of discrimination (impure altruism, altruistic punishment, reciprocity, trust, and coordination -according to the chosen amount in games-) |
|
Tsutsui and Zizzo (2014)
|
Experimental economics |
To look at how changing relative group size and changing group status affects trust and trustworthiness. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (trust -giving and return rates- and perceived value measurement) |
|
van Ewijk (2011)
|
Experimental economics |
To examine whether ethnic majority teachers grade minority and majority students differently for the same work. |
Discrimination |
Education sector |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (grade and expectations for the essays attributed to different ethnicity students) |
|
Zeitzoff (2018)
|
Experimental economics |
To measure how anger over past conflict influences intergroup relations. |
Discrimination |
Behavioral economics |
Direct study on discrimination |
Experiences of discrimination (altruism -monetary choices-) |
