Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 29;39(19-20):1318–1328. doi: 10.1089/neu.2021.0408

Table 2.

Two-Week Global White Matter Axial Diffusivity Is Independently Associated with Incomplete Recovery (GOSE <8 vs. = 8 at Six Months Post-Injury (n = 356)

  Odds ratio 95% CI Wald Chisq p
Age 1.01 (0.99, 1.03) 0.28 0.59
Sex (Female vs. Male) 2.05 (1.25, 3.39) 7.94 0.005
Race     2.08 0.35
Black vs. White 0.74 (0.40, 1.36)
Other vs. White 0.60 (0.27, 1.37)
Ethnicity (Hispanic vs. Non-Hispanic) 1.21 (0.63, 2.34) 0.32 0.57
Years of education 0.94 (0.85, 1.03) 1.88 0.17
Injury mechanism (Assault/violence vs. accidental) 1.74 (0.67, 4.50) 1.28 0.26
Psychiatric history (Yes vs. No) 1.90 (1.03, 3.50) 4.24 0.040
Prior TBI (Yes vs. No) 1.86 (1.16, 2.99) 6.55 0.010
Head CT (Positive vs. Negative) 1.54 (0.93, 2.55) 2.83 0.09
Global AD (standardized) 0.77 (0.61, 0.96) 5.20 0.023

GOSE, Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended; CI, confidence interval; WM, white matter; Wald Chisq,, Wald chi square; TBI, traumatic brain injury; CT, computed tomography; AD, axial diffusivity.

*

C–index of the model = 0.677, compared with the model without global axial diffusivity (C-index = 0.655); the improvement was not significant.