Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 4;8(10):e10892. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10892

Table 3.

The mediating effect of models.

Path Estimate Percentile 95% CI
P
lower upper
Model 1
NEMP → SDS → PCL-C 0.02 −0.10 0.15 0.66
NEMP → SAS → PCL-C 0.55 0.08 1.17 0.02
NEMP → SDS → SAS → PCL-C 0.42 0.11 0.85 0.01
Total indirect effects 0.99 0.40 1.79 0.00
Total 0.77 0.16 1.51 0.01
Model 2
NDLM → PSQI → PCL-C 0.11 −0.01 0.37 0.12
NDLM → SAS → PCL-C 0.83 0.42 1.41 0.00
NDLM → PSQI → SAS → PCL-C 0.31 0.01 0.74 0.045
Total indirect effects 1.25 0.60 2.14 0.00
Total 0.82 0.15 1.57 0.02
Model 3
Animal-based protein → SAS → PCL-C −1.97 −4.39 −0.42 0.01
Animal-based protein → SDS → PCL-C 0.06 −0.41 0.52 0.78
Animal-based protein → PSQI → PCL-C −0.41 −1.15 0.07 0.10
Total indirect effects −2.32 −4.90 −0.69 0.00
Total −2.65 −5.07 −0.91 0.00

Model 1, Serial multiple mediation model of effect of NEMP on PTSD; Model 2, Serial multiple mediation model of effect of NDLM on PTSD; Model 3, The multiple mediation model of effect of animal-based protein pattern on PTSD; NDLM, last meal jet lag between night shift and day shift; NEMP, Night shift eat midpoint.