Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Perinatol. 2022 Jun 10;46(7):151635. doi: 10.1016/j.semperi.2022.151635

Contributions of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network’s Generic Database to Documenting and Advancing the Outcomes of Extremely Preterm Infants

Edward F Bell a,*, Barbara J Stoll b,c, Nellie I Hansen d, Myra H Wyckoff e, Michele C Walsh f, Pablo J Sánchez g, Matthew A Rysavy c, Jenna H Gabrio h, Stephanie W Archer f, Abhik Das i, Rosemary D Higgins j; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Networka
PMCID: PMC9529835  NIHMSID: NIHMS1815287  PMID: 35835615

Abstract

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network (NRN) maintains a database of extremely preterm infants known as the Generic Database (GDB). Begun in 1987, this database now includes more than 91,000 infants, most of whom are extremely preterm (<29 weeks gestation). The GDB has been a backbone of the NRN, providing high quality, prospectively collected data to study the changing epidemiology of extreme prematurity and its outcomes over time. In addition, GDB data have been used to generate hypotheses for prospective studies and to develop new clinical trials by providing information about the numbers and characteristics of available subjects and the expected event rates for conditions and complications to be studied. Since its inception, the GDB has been the basis of more than 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals, many of which have had a significant impact on the field of neonatology.

Introduction

The Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Neonatal Research Network (NRN) was established in 1986 to conduct research to improve the health of preterm and critically ill newborn infants. The intent of the Network was to have centers work collaboratively on the design and implementation of clinical studies that would have an impact on the care and outcome of high-risk newborns. The NRN consists of a data coordinating center (DCC) and a group of academic medical centers (clinical centers), each with one or more neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). The DCC and the clinical centers are selected every 5 years through a competitive NIH peer-reviewed application process. The number of clinical centers has varied from 8–18 over the years (Table 1), with 1–7 NICUs in each center. The first data coordinating center was the George Washington University Biostatistics Center; RTI International has been the DCC since 1998.

Table 1.

Neonatal Research Network clinical centers by funding cycle

1986–1991 (8 centers)
University of Alabama
University of Vermont
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
Dartmouth University (Vermont subsite)
University of Tennessee
University of Miami
1991–1996 (12 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
University of Tennessee
University of Miami
Emory University
University of New Mexico
University of Cincinnati
Indiana University
Yale University
Brown University
Stanford University
1996–2001 (15 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
University of Tennessee
University of Miami
Emory University
University of New Mexico
University of Cincinnati
Indiana University
Yale University
Brown University
Stanford University
University of Alabama
Harvard University (1996–1998)
University of Texas-Houston (joined 7/98)
2001–2006 (16 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
University of Miami
Emory University
University of Cincinnati
Indiana University
Yale University
Brown University
Stanford University
University of Alabama
University of Texas-Houston
Duke University
Wake Forest University
University of Rochester
University of California-San Diego
2006–2011 (16 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
Emory University
University of Cincinnati
Indiana University
Yale University
Brown University
Stanford University
University of Alabama
University of Texas-Houston
Duke University
Tufts University
University of Iowa
University of Utah
University of New Mexico
2011–2016 (18 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Wayne State University
Emory University
University of Cincinnati
Indiana University
Brown University
Stanford University
University of Alabama
University of Texas-Houston
Duke University
University of Iowa
University of New Mexico
University of Pennsylvania
University of Rochester
University of California-Los Angeles
Ohio State University
University of Missouri-Kansas City
2016–2023 (15 centers)
Case Western Reserve University
University of Texas-Dallas
Emory University
University of Cincinnati
Brown University
Stanford University
University of Alabama
University of Texas-Houston
Duke University
University of Iowa
University of Utah
University of New Mexico
University of Pennsylvania
University of Rochester
Ohio State University

Since 1987, the NRN has maintained a registry of extremely preterm infants, known as the Generic Database (GDB). The GDB was designed to monitor trends in antenatal and postnatal care, in-hospital morbidities, and mortality of very low birth weight preterm infants at NRN centers. Trained research coordinators collect the data prospectively in a uniform manner. The GDB now includes more than 91,000 infants. The enrollment criteria have changed over the years based on birth weight and/or gestational age (Table 2). The database has always included extremely low birth weight (≤1000 g) infants who are nearly all extremely preterm (defined in this network as <29 weeks gestation). The current enrollment criteria are birth weight 401–1000 grams inclusive and/or gestational age 20 0/7 through 28 6/7 weeks. Preterm infants enrolled in Network trials or observational studies that would not otherwise be eligible based on gestational age or birth weight are also eligible for enrollment in the GDB.

Table 2.

Enrollment criteria for the Generic Database.

1987–1994 Birth weight 501–1500 grams inborn or outborn and admitted within 14 days
1995–2007 Birth weight 401–1500 grams inborn or outborn and admitted within 14 days
2008 to 2019 Birth weight 401–1000 grams and/or gestational age 22 through 28 weeks, inborn only; or enrollment in a Network trial or observational study that may include preterm infants not otherwise eligible based on gestational age or birth weight
2020 to present Birth weight 401–1000 grams and/or gestational age 20 through 28 weeks, inborn only; or enrollment in a Network trial or observational study that may include preterm infants not otherwise eligible based on gestational age or birth weight

The current GDB enrollment is approximately 2,000 infants per year. Although not population based, the large number of mothers and infants at NRN centers reflect racial, ethnic, and geographic diversity. The data provide a window into current care and outcomes at tertiary academic centers in the United States and changes over time. The data coordinating center, RTI International, produces annual summaries with key data by center. Because both practice and outcomes vary among centers, these reports provide centers with a useful tool for benchmarking their outcomes and identifying targets for quality improvement efforts. The reports have stimulated ideas for research projects investigating associations between practice and outcome variations that have informed care, such as with antibiotic stewardship.

The GDB is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00063063) and approved by the institutional review boards of all participating institutions. Most institutional review boards have granted waivers of consent for collection of deidentified data from the infant’s hospital course, although several require written or verbal parental consent.

Generic Database Publications

Since its inception, the GDB has been the basis of more than 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals, representing approximately half of all NRN publications. If we include the additional articles resulting from clinical trials that included data from the GDB, 361 of 437 (82.6%) of papers published from the NRN through early February 2022 relied on the GDB. These publications have had a significant impact on the field of neonatology. Every few years, NRN investigators have published summary articles on the changing epidemiology of extreme prematurity and its complications.19 The first six GDB summary papers reported outcomes by birth weight.16 Since 2010, outcomes have been reported by gestational age.79

The most recent paper in this series was the first to include not only survival to hospital discharge and in-hospital morbidities but also 2-year neurodevelopmental and health outcomes.9 The key findings of this most recent overview paper were that survival to discharge has continued to increase and was 78.3% for infants of gestational age 22–28 weeks who were born 2013–2018. The biggest increase in survival was seen at 22 weeks gestation, where the survival rate increased to 10.9% of liveborn infants from 6.6% in 2008–2012. The survival rate for actively treated 22-week infants was 30.0%. The rates of necrotizing enterocolitis, severe intracranial hemorrhage, and retinopathy of prematurity were lower in 2013–2018 compared to 2008–2012, but the rate of bronchopulmonary dysplasia was higher. By 2-year follow-up assessment (completed only for infants <27 weeks gestation), 8.4% of infants had moderate or severe cerebral palsy, 1.5% were blind in both eyes, 2.5% required hearing aids or cochlear implants, 15.4% required mobility aids or other supportive devices, 11.5% required at least some tube feeding, 5.3% received oxygen, 1.7% required a ventilator or continuous positive airway pressure, and 49.9% had required rehospitalization. Of those with complete neurodevelopmental assessments, 48.7% had no or only mild impairment, 29.3% had moderate impairment, and 21.2% had severe impairment.

Other papers based on GDB data have covered a wide range of topics, including delivery room management, neonatal nutrition, neonatal infections, and neonatal lung disease. Collectively, these overview and topic-specific papers have influenced clinical practice and the practice recommendations of professional organizations, thus having an impact on the field of neonatology. In addition, GDB data are often used to generate hypotheses or calculate sample sizes for prospective studies.

The NICHD Extremely Preterm Birth Outcomes Tool (https://www.nichd.nih.gov/research/supported/EPBO) was developed using GDB data. The tool allows estimation of the survival probability of extremely preterm infants from five factors available at birth: infant sex, birth weight, gestational age, plurality, and exposure to antenatal corticosteroids given for fetal maturation. This open-source tool is accessible and widely used by professionals and the public to estimate potential outcomes for extremely preterm infants and also to help with counseling parents.18,26 This website is accessed approximately 30,000 times annually.

As another example of impact, NRN publications based on GDB data have contributed to practice changes and guideline development. For example, survival data from the GDB prompted the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists to recommend in a new practice advisory that antenatal corticosteroids may be considered at 22 0/7 weeks to 22 6/7 weeks of gestation if neonatal resuscitation is planned and after appropriate counseling (https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/practice-advisory/articles/2021/09/use-of-antenatal-corticosteroids-at-22-weeks-of-gestation).27,28

Of the 20 most highly cited NRN publications, 19 included data from the GDB, and 19 of the NRN’s papers (18 using GDB data) have been cited more than 500 times by other publications (Table 3).58,1025 Many of the NRN’s publications that use GDB data are in high impact journals, such as the New England Journal of Medicine10,16,18,19,22,28,3037 and JAMA.8,9,12,27,38,39 Many GDB-based publications have been written by or with the participation and authorship of trainees and junior faculty members, thereby helping to advance their careers during early stages.

Table 3.

Most highly cited Neonatal Research Network publications.

Citations* First Author Title Journal and Year Reference Number Used GDB Data?
2004 Shankaran Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy N Engl J Med 2005 10 no
1746 Stoll Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants from the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Pediatrics 2010 7 yes
1639 Stoll Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network Pediatrics 2002 11 yes
1314 Stoll Trends in Care Practices, Morbidity, and Mortality of Extremely Preterm Neonates, 1993–2012 JAMA 2015 8 yes
1099 Stoll Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection JAMA 2004 12 yes
1049 Lemons Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child health and human development neonatal research network, January 1995 through December 1996. NICHD Neonatal Research Network Pediatrics 2001 5 yes
946 Vohr Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993–1994 Pediatrics 2000 13 yes
908 Ehrenkranz Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants Pediatrics 2006 14 yes
896 Fanaroff Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007 6 yes
829 Ehrenkranz Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia Pediatrics 2005 15 yes
778 Finer Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants N Engl J Med 2010 16 yes
738 Stoll Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network J Pediatr 1996 17 yes
694 Tyson Intensive care for extreme prematurity – moving beyond gestational age N Engl J Med 2008 18 yes
687 Carlo Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants N Engl J Med 2010 19 yes
687 Stoll Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues Pediatrics 2011 20 yes
665 Ehrenkranz Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants Pediatrics 1999 21 yes
632 Stoll Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants N Engl J Med 2002 22 yes
590 Cotten Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants Pediatrics 2009 23 yes
517 Hintz Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis Pediatrics 2005 24 yes
465 Benjamin Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months Pediatrics 2006 25 yes
*

Citations from Scopus on 04/12/22.

This brief overview has focused on publications that were based primarily on data from the GDB. The related NRN follow-up study, reporting neurodevelopmental and health outcomes at 2 years for infants born before 27 weeks gestational age, is closely linked to the GDB and relies on GDB data. The follow-up study is one of the NRN’s greatest strengths, as no other US neonatal network provides such high-quality systematic follow-up of its extremely preterm infants. The NRN’s publications reporting follow-up outcomes also rely on data from the GDB about the infant’s hospital course. The neurodevelopmental follow-up component of the NRN is the subject of another article in this issue of Seminars in Perinatology.

Generic Database Data Use to Develop Clinical Trials

The GDB has provided baseline data needed in the development of dozens of clinical trials involving preterm infants (Table 4).16,19,2938,4047 Many of the 27 trials shown in Table 4 had ancillary studies that were also informed by data from the GDB. The GDB provides information about the number of available subjects for trials and the expected event rates for conditions to be studied.

Table 4.

Clinical trials designed using data from the Generic Database.

First Author Title Journal and Year Reference Number
Horbar A multicenter randomized trial comparing two surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network J Pediatr 1993 40
Fanaroff A controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin to reduce nosocomial infections in very-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network N Engl J Med 1994 29
Shankaran The effect of antenatal phenobarbital therapy on neonatal intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants N Engl J Med 1997 30
Papile A multicenter trial of two dexamethasone regimens in ventilator-dependent premature infants N Engl J Med 1998 31
Tyson Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network N Engl J Med 1999 32
Phelps Supplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold Retinopathy Of Prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial. I: primary outcomes Pediatrics 2000 41
Stark Adverse effects of early dexamethasone treatment in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network N Engl J Med 2001 33
Ohls Effects of early erythropoietin therapy on the transfusion requirements of preterm infants below 1250 grams birth weight: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial Pediatrics 2001 42
Poindexter Parenteral glutamine supplementation does not reduce the risk of mortality or late-onset sepsis in extremely low birth weight infants Pediatrics 2004 43
Van Meurs Inhaled nitric oxide for premature infants with severe respiratory failure N Engl J Med 2005 34
Walsh A cluster-randomized trial of benchmarking and multimodal quality improvement to improve rates of survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia for infants with birth weights of less than 1250 grams Pediatrics 2007 44
Morris Aggressive vs. conservative phototherapy for infants with extremely low birth weight N Engl J Med 2008 35
Carlo Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants N Engl J Med 2010 19
Finer Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants N Engl J Med 2010 16
Oh Effects of delayed cord clamping in very-low-birth-weight infants J Perinatol 2011 45
Bell Serum tocopherol levels in very preterm infants after a single dose of vitamin E at birth Pediatrics 2013 46
Phelps Effects of Myo-inositol on type 1 retinopathy of prematurity among preterm infants <28 weeks’ gestational age: a randomized clinical trial JAMA 2018 38
Kirpalani Higher or lower hemoglobin transfusion thresholds for preterm infants N Engl J Med 2020 36
Blakely Initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage in extremely low birthweight infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a multicenter randomized clinical trial Ann Surg 2021 47
Watterberg Hydrocortisone to improve survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia N Engl J Med 2022 37
DeMauro Early school age follow-up of the NRN Hydrocortisone for BPD Trial NCT01353313 *
Colaizy Effects of donor milk vs formula on neurocognitive outcome NCT01534481 *
Conrad & DeMauro Transfusion of Prematures Trial early school age follow-up (TOP 5) NCT01702805 *
Ohls Darbepoetin trial to improve red cell mass and neuroprotection in preterm infants NCT03169881 *
Laughon Management of the patent ductus arteriosus in premature infants trial (PDA Trial) NCT03456336 *
Tyson Cycled phototherapy: a safer effective method to control the serum bilirubin of extremely premature infants? NCT03927833 *
Ambalavanan Randomized controlled trial of budesonide + surfactant versus surfactant alone in extremely preterm infants NCT04545866 *
*

Trial in progress

GDB data have also been used to inform the Data and Safety Monitoring Committees (DSMCs) for NRN clinical trials. Before initiation of a trial in the extremely preterm population, lists of potential adverse events and event rates for common complications, such as death, intracranial hemorrhage, and sepsis, are generated for the eligible population for the individual trial. This provides a baseline rate of complications to inform DSMC reviews, especially if there is divergence between the treatment and control groups early in a clinical trial. Further, the data can be examined by gestational age subgroup (e.g., 26 weeks and above or 25 weeks and lower). This information can be valuable in a high-risk population where significant morbidity and mortality can occur.

The GDB also provides a rich data source to compare infants enrolled with those eligible but not enrolled in clinical trials. Such analyses allow assessment of generalizability of the trials.39,48,49

Generic Database Ancillary Studies

The NRN has expanded the GDB format to other patient populations, resulting in related registry studies.

Two comprehensive studies of early-onset sepsis (EOS) among infants of all gestational ages with birth weights above 400 grams born at NRN centers (EOS I, 2006–2009, and EOS II, 2015–2017) expanded surveillance for EOS that began with preterm infants enrolled in the GDB.20,50 Collectively, these surveillance studies, conducted in partnership with the CDC, provided data on the changing epidemiology of EOS.

The Moderate Preterm Registry enrolled 7,057 infants with gestational ages of 29 through 33 weeks in 2012 and 2013 and examined their rates of mortality and morbidity.51,52 The Moderate Preterm Registry stimulated several published analyses of data from the registry,5358 a completed clinical trial (Weaning of Moderately Preterm Infants from the Incubator to the Crib: a Randomized Clinical Trial),59 and another clinical trial that is still in progress (Moderately Preterm Infants with Caffeine at Home for Apnea Trial; NCT03340727).

The All-Birth Cohort Study is a registry of intrapartum stillbirths that occurred between 2017 and 2022 at gestational ages of 20 through 28 weeks, the same gestational age range as the GDB. The purpose of the All-Birth Cohort Study is to examine the prevalence of intrapartum stillbirth and its associated factors by gestational age week at NRN sites.

Conclusions

The Neonatal Research Network’s Generic Database (GDB) has collected data on extremely preterm infants since 1987 and now includes more than 91,000 infants. The GDB has been a valuable resource for studying the changing epidemiology of extreme prematurity and its complications and for generating hypotheses for prospective studies. GDB data have been used to help develop 27 clinical trials. Since its inception, the GDB has been the basis of more than 200 publications in peer-reviewed journals. Of the 20 most highly cited NRN publications, 19 included data from the GDB and 18 of these have been cited more than 500 times. The NRN’s Generic Database is a unique source of epidemiologic data that serves multiple valuable purposes for the benefit of the scientific community and the lay public.

Funding Support

Supported in part by National Institutes of Health and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) cooperative agreements: U10 HD021373, UG1 HD021364, UG1 HD021385, UG1 HD027851, UG1 HD027853, UG1 HD027856, UG1 HD027880,UG1 HD027904, UG1 HD034216, UG1 HD036790, UG1 HD040492, UG1 HD040689, UG1 HD053089, UG1 HD053109, UG1 HD068244, UG1 HD068270, UG1 HD068278, UG1 HD068263, UG1 HD068284; UG1 HD087226, and UG1 HD087229 and National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) contracts UL1 TR000006, UL1 TR000041, UL1 TR000042, UL1 TR000077, UL1 TR000093, UL1 TR000105, UL1 TR000442, UL1 TR000454, and UL1 TR001117.

Abbreviations

DCC

Data coordinating center

DSMC

Data and Safety Monitoring Committee

EOS

Early-onset sepsis

GDB

Generic Database

NICU

Neonatal intensive care unit

NRN

Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network

Footnotes

Publisher's Disclaimer: This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

Disclosures

While NICHD staff had input into the study design, conduct, analysis, and manuscript drafting, the comments and views of the authors do not necessarily represent the views of NICHD, the National Institutes of Health, the Department of Health and Human Services, or the U.S. Government.

ClinicalTrials.gov ID

Generic Database NCT00063063.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

References

  • 1.Hack M, Horbar JD, Malloy MH, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network. Pediatrics. 1991;87:587–597. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hack M, Wright LL, Shankaran S, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Network, November 1989 to October 1990. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;172:457–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Fanaroff AA, Wright LL, Stevenson DK, et al. Very-low-birth-weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, May 1991 through December 1992. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:1423–1431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Stevenson DK, Wright LL, Lemons JA, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1993 through December 1994. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1998;197:1632–1639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Lemons JA, Bauer CR, Oh W, et al. Very low birth weight outcomes of the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, January 1995 through December 1996. Pediatrics. 2001;107:E1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Fanaroff AA, Stoll BJ, Wright LL, et al. Trends in neonatal morbidity and mortality for very low birthweight infants. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196:147.e1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Neonatal outcomes of extremely preterm infants in the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2010;126:443–456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Bell EF, et al. Trends in care practices, morbidity, and mortality of extremely preterm neonates, 1993–2012. JAMA. 2015;314:1039–1051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Bell EF, Hintz SR, Hansen NI, et al. Mortality, in-hospital morbidity, care practices, and 2-year outcomes for extremely preterm infants in the US, 2013–2018. JAMA. 2022;327:248–263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shankaran S, Laptook AR, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Whole-body hypothermia for neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1574–1584. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: the experience of the NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Pediatrics. 2002;110:285–291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Adams-Chapman I, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth impairment among extremely low-birth-weight infants with neonatal infection. JAMA. 2004;292:2357–2365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Vohr BR, Wright LL, Dusick AM, et al. Neurodevelopmental and functional outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants in the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network, 1993–1994. Pediatrics. 2000;105:1216–1226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Ehrenkranz RA, Dusick AM, Vohr BR, et al. Growth in the neonatal intensive care unit influences neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2006;117:1253–1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Ehrenkranz RA, Walsh MC, Vohr BR, et al. Validation of the National Institutes of Health consensus definition of bronchopulmonary dysplasia. Pediatrics. 2005;116:1353–1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Finer NN, Carlo WA, Walsh MC, et al. Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1970–1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Stoll BJ, Gordon T, Korones SB, et al. Late-onset sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: a report from the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr. 1996;129:63–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Tyson JE, Parikh NA, Langer J, Green C, Higgins RD, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1672–1681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Carlo WA, Finer NN, Walsh MC, et al. Target ranges of oxygen saturation in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2010;362:1959–1969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Stoll BJ, Hansen NI, Sánchez PJ, et al. Early onset neonatal sepsis: the burden of group B Streptococcal and E. coli disease continues. Pediatrics. 2011;127:817–826. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ehrenkranz RA, Younes N, Lemons JA, et al. Longitudinal growth of hospitalized very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 1999;104:280–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stoll BJ, Hansen N, Fanaroff AA, et al. Changes in pathogens causing early-onset sepsis in very-low-birth-weight infants. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:240–247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cotten CM, Taylor S, Stoll B, et al. Prolonged duration of initial empirical antibiotic treatment is associated with increased rates of necrotizing enterocolitis and death for extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2009;123:58–66. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Hintz SR, Kendrick DE, Stoll BJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of extremely low birth weight infants after necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatrics. 2005;115:696–703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Fanaroff AA, et al. Neonatal candidiasis among extremely low birth weight infants: risk factors, mortality rates, and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 18 to 22 months. Pediatrics. 2006;117:84–92. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rysavy MA, Horbar JD, Bell EF, et al. Assessment of an updated Neonatal Research Network extremely preterm birth outcome model in the Vermont Oxford Network. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:e196294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Carlo WA, McDonald SA, Fanaroff AA, et al. Association of antenatal corticosteroids with mortality and neurodevelopmental outcomes among infants born at 22 through 25 weeks gestation. JAMA. 2011;306:2348–2358. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rysavy MA, Li L, Bell EF, et al. Between-hospital variation in treatment and outcomes in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1801–1811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Fanaroff AA, Korones SB, Wright LL, et al. A controlled trial of intravenous immune globulin to reduce nosocomial infections in very-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 1994;330:1107–1113. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Shankaran S, Papile LA, Wright LL, et al. The effect of antenatal phenobarbital therapy on neonatal intracranial hemorrhage in preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 1997;337:466–471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Papile LA, Tyson JE, Stoll BJ, et al. A multicenter trial of two dexamethasone regimens in ventilator-dependent premature infants. N Engl J Med. 1998;338:1112–1118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tyson JE, Wright LL, Oh W, et al. Vitamin A supplementation for extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 1999;340:1962–1968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Stark AR, Carlo WA, Tyson JE, et al. Adverse effects of early dexamethasone treatment in extremely-low-birth-weight infants. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. N Engl J Med. 2001;344:95–101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Van Meurs KP, Wright LL, Ehrenkranz RA, et al. Inhaled nitric oxide for premature infants with severe respiratory failure. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:13–22. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Morris BH, Oh W, Tyson JE, et al. Aggressive vs. conservative phototherapy for infants with extremely low birth weight. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1885–1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Kirpalani H, Bell EF, Hintz SR, et al. Higher or lower hemoglobin transfusion thresholds for preterm infants. N Engl J Med. 2020;383:2639–2651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Watterberg KL, Walsh MC, Li L, et al. Hydrocortisone to improve survival without bronchopulmonary dysplasia. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:1121–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Phelps DL, Watterberg KL, Nolen TL, et al. Effects of Myo-inositol on type 1 retinopathy of prematurity among preterm infants <28 weeks gestational age: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2018;320:1649–1658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Foglia EE, Nolen TL, DeMauro SB, et al. Short-term outcomes of infants enrolled in randomized clinical trials vs those eligible but not enrolled. JAMA. 2015;313:2377–2379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Horbar JD, Wright LL, Soll RF, et al. A multicenter randomized trial comparing two surfactants for the treatment of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. J Pediatr. 1993;123:757–766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Phelps DL, Lindblad A, Bradford JD, et al. Supplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold Retinopathy Of Prematurity (STOP-ROP), a randomized, controlled trial. I: primary outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000;105:295–310. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ohls RK, Ehrenkranz RA, Wright LL, et al. Effects of early erythropoietin therapy on the transfusion requirements of preterm infants below 1250 grams birth weight: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2001;108:934–942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Poindexter BB, Ehrenkranz RA, Stoll BJ, et al. Parenteral glutamine supplementation does not reduce the risk of mortality or late-onset sepsis in extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics. 2004;113:1209–1215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Walsh M, Laptook A, Kazzi SN, et al. A cluster-randomized trial of benchmarking and multimodal quality improvement to improve rates of survival free of bronchopulmonary dysplasia for infants with birth weights of less than 1250 grams. Pediatrics. 2007;119:876–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Oh W, Fanaroff AA, Carlo WA, et al. Effects of delayed cord clamping in very-low-birth-weight infants. J Perinatol. 2011;31:S68–S71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Bell EF, Hansen NI, Brion LP, et al. Serum tocopherol levels in very preterm infants after a single dose of vitamin E at birth. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e1626–e1633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Blakely ML, Tyson JE, Lally KP, et al. Initial laparotomy versus peritoneal drainage in extremely low birthweight infants with surgical necrotizing enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2021;274:e370–e380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Rich WD, Auten KJ, Gantz MG, et al. Antenatal consent in the SUPPORT trial: challenges, costs, and representative enrollment. Pediatrics. 2010;126:e215–e221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Rich W, Finer NN, Gantz MG, et al. Enrollment of extremely low birth weight infants in a clinical research study may not be representative. Pediatrics. 2012;129:480–484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Stoll BJ, Puopolo KM, Hansen NI, et al. Contemporary characteristics of early-onset neonatal sepsis: the rise of Escherichia coli and need for novel prevention strategies. JAMA Pediatr. 2020;174:e200593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Trembath AN, Payne AH, Colaizy TT, Bell EF, Walsh MC. The problems of moderate preterm infants. Semin Perinatol. 2016;40:370–373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Walsh MC, Bell EF, Kandefer S, et al. Neonatal outcomes of moderately preterm infants compared to extremely preterm infants. Pediatr Res. 2017;82:297–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Laptook AR, Bell EF, Shankaran S, et al. Admission temperature and associated mortality and morbidity among moderately and extremely preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2018;192:53–59.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Bajaj M, Natarajan G, Shankaran S, et al. Delivery room resuscitation and short-term outcomes in moderately preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2018;195:33–38. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Natarajan G, Shankaran S, Saha S, et al. Antecedents and outcomes of abnormal cranial imaging in moderately preterm infants. J Pediatr. 2018;195:66–72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Brumbaugh JE, Colaizy TT, Saha S, et al. Oral feeding practices and discharge timing for moderately preterm infants. Early Hum Dev. 2018;120:46–52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chawla S, Natarajan G, Chowdhury D, et al. Neonatal morbidities among moderately preterm infants with and without exposure to antenatal corticosteroids. Am J Perinatol. 2018;35:1213–1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Edwards L, Cotten CM, Smith PB, et al. Inadequate oral feeding as a barrier to discharge in moderately preterm infants. J Perinatol. 2019;39:1219–1228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Shankaran S, Bell EF, Laptook AR, et al. Weaning of moderately preterm infants from the incubator to the crib: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr. 2019; 204:96–102.e4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES