Skip to main content
. 2019 Jul 5;13(5):467–476. doi: 10.1007/s12687-019-00428-5

Table 2.

Summary of evidentiary challenges when evaluating NGS technologies

Challenges Examples Addressed Gaps
1) Accounting for all NGS outcomes

- Health outcomes

- Non-health outcomes:

 ○ Information

 ○ Process

 ○ Test characteristics

- Preference studies include non-health attributes

- Should economic evaluations incorporate non-health outcomes?

- If so, how?

2) Addressing uncertainty

- Limited data available:

 ○ Accuracy

 ○ Clinical outcomes

 ○ Canadian context

- Heterogeneity of NGS

- Future changes in services and outcomes

- Parameter uncertainty

 ○ Probabilistic and deterministic analysis

- Decision uncertainty

 ○ Value of information

- Model uncertainty

 ○ Scenario analysis

- Accuracy in economic evaluations

- Uncertainty in stated preference studies

3) Improving consistency

- Difficult to capture benefits of NGS:

 ○ Diagnostic odyssey

 ○ Comparison strategies

 ○ Downstream effects (e.g., cascade testing)

- Study design and methods in the absence of RCT data

- Transparency around ad hoc decisions

- Guidance on:

 ○ Data collection

 ○ Study designs

 ○ Statistical methods

NGS, next-generation sequencing; RCT, randomized controlled trial