Table 2.
Challenges | Examples | Addressed | Gaps |
---|---|---|---|
1) Accounting for all NGS outcomes |
- Health outcomes - Non-health outcomes: ○ Information ○ Process ○ Test characteristics |
- Preference studies include non-health attributes |
- Should economic evaluations incorporate non-health outcomes? - If so, how? |
2) Addressing uncertainty |
- Limited data available: ○ Accuracy ○ Clinical outcomes ○ Canadian context - Heterogeneity of NGS - Future changes in services and outcomes |
- Parameter uncertainty ○ Probabilistic and deterministic analysis - Decision uncertainty ○ Value of information - Model uncertainty ○ Scenario analysis |
- Accuracy in economic evaluations - Uncertainty in stated preference studies |
3) Improving consistency |
- Difficult to capture benefits of NGS: ○ Diagnostic odyssey ○ Comparison strategies ○ Downstream effects (e.g., cascade testing) - Study design and methods in the absence of RCT data |
- Transparency around ad hoc decisions |
- Guidance on: ○ Data collection ○ Study designs ○ Statistical methods |
NGS, next-generation sequencing; RCT, randomized controlled trial