Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 23;37(3):ME22011. doi: 10.1264/jsme2.ME22011

Table 1.

Relative abundance (%) of major bacterial phyla1,2

Phylum Ileum Cecum Colon Feces
Control Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment Control Treatment
Firmicutes 70.96±6.80 73.61±8.50 53.95±0.78 53.74±0.99 68.68±1.21 71.00±1.38 75.86±2.10 72.85±1.43
Bacteroidetes 4.23±2.29 1.89±1.81 38.77±0.86 38.35±0.88 24.75±1.05 22.20±1.27 17.27±2.16 20.93±1.56
Verrucomicrobia 0.20±0.14 0.11±0.10 1.54±0.19 1.87±0.20 1.53±0.19 2.12±0.36 2.40±0.33 1.94±0.28
Spirochaetes 0.09±0.08 0.11±0.11 0.97±0.33 0.58±0.16 1.55±0.34 1.10±0.18 1.10±0.24 0.82±0.17
Proteobacteria 22.58±7.02 23.16±8.85 1.56±0.20 1.67±0.30 0.85±0.17 0.60±0.08 0.99±0.19 0.76±0.14
Actinobacteriota 0.52±0.18 0.91±0.43 0.54±0.06 a 0.81±0.09 b 0.50±0.08 a 1.10±0.15 b 0.59±0.09 a 1.12±0.16 b

1 The top six bacterial phyla found in fecal samples of the control group are shown. Data are expressed as the mean±SEM.

2 Control (n=10), Treatment (n=10).

a, b Bacterial abundance in the control and treatment groups belonging to the same sample collection site with different letters significantly differ (the Mann-Whitney U test, P<0.05).