Skip to main content
. 2001 Jul;183(14):4202–4209. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.14.4202-4209.2001

TABLE 2.

Expression of the B. cepacia PalkB promoter in strain CPBC2 grown at the expense of different carbon sources

Carbon sourcea PalkB promoter expression during:
Exponential phase
Stationary phase
Activityb Repressionc Activityb Repressionc
TetOH 1,160 1 6,280 1
LB 74 NA 97 NA
LB+TetOH 100 12 99 63
Spent LB 74 15 115 54
Spent LB+TetOH 53 22 105 60
TetOH+citrate 82 14 102 61
TetOH+fumarate 64 18 80 78
TetOH+lactate 71 16 83 76
TetOH+pyruvate 101 11 97 65
TetOH+succinate 62 19 88 71
TetOH+glutamate 70 16 89 70
TetOH+acetate 129 9 100 62
TetOH+glycerol 140 8 80 78
TetOH+glucose 69 17 73 86
TetOH+fructose 79 15 123 51
TetOH+lactose 97 12 100 63
TetOH+arabinose 90 13 88 71
TetOH+myristic acid 292 4 379 16
a

Cells were grown in fresh or spent LB medium in the absence or presence of tetradecanol (1% [wt/vol]) or in minimal salts medium in the presence of either tetradecanol (1% [wt/vol]) or a combination of tetradecanol and the indicated compound (30 mM for organic acids or sugars, 1% for myristic acid). TetOH, tetradecanol. 

b

Activity of the B. cepacia PalkB promoter (in Miller units) under each growth condition in exponentially growing or in stationary-phase cells. Values represent the averages of three independent assays; the standard deviation was less than 20%. 

c

Repression (in folds) indicates the decrease in promoter activity observed in each case relative to the activity observed when tetradecanol was the sole carbon source. NA, nonapplicable.