Skip to main content
. 2021 Oct 4;128(7):1322–1334. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521003986

Table 3.

Comparisons of original Mediterranean diet score between the intervention groups at specific time points

(Mean values and 95 % confidence intervals)

Timepoint Covariate n Intervention group comparisons
PSG v. MSG PSG v. DSG
MSG DSG PSG Mean difference 95 % CI P value Mean difference 95 % CI P value
Baseline Screening 21 22 25 1·49 0·48, 2·51 0·01 1·20 0·18, 2·20 0·02
3 months Screening 14 20 21 0·99 –0·38, 2·37 0·15 0·16 –1·09, 1·41 0·80
6 months Screening 13 21 19 1·92 0·37, 3·47 0·02 0·14 –1·25, 1·52 0·85
12 months Screening 15 21 16 0·63 1·00, 2·27 0·44 –0·67 –2·17, 0·84 0·38
3 months Baseline 14 20 21 0·37 –1·05, 1·79 0·60 –0·30 –1·52, 0·92 0·63
6 months Baseline 13 21 19 1·41 –0·16, 2·97 0·08 –0·33 –1·67, 1·01 0·63
12 months Baseline 15 21 16 –0·08 –1·75, 1·59 0·92 –1·15 –2·62, 0·32 0·12

PSG, peer support group; DSG, dietitian support group; MSG, minimal support group. Results obtained from ANCOVA, with either screening or baseline MDS included as a covariate and presented as mean differences (95 % CI).