Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 20;13:929306. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.929306

Table 4.

Volumetric brain regions showing significant differences by diagnostic group.

ROI F-test Direction T-test
lh_entorhinal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 2.874, p = 0.004 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.288, p = 0.009
lh_inferiorparietal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.115, p = 0.036 HV > SCZ t (27.0) = 3.284, p = 0.009
BD > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.075, p = 0.001
lh_inferiortemporal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.609, p = 0.008 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.872, p <0.001
lh_lateralorbitofrontal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.868, p = 0.008 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.545, p <0.001
BD > SCZ t (27.0) = 3.03, p = 0.016
lh_posteriorcingulate_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.001, p = 0.045 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.404, p = 0.007
lh_precuneus_volume F (2.0, 36.0) =0.007, p = 0.006 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.103, p = 0.001
lh_superiorfrontal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.013, p = 0.006 HV > SCZ t (27.0) = 3.868, p = 0.002
BD > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.386, p = 0.001
lh_supramarginal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.028, p = 0.013 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.109, p = 0.014
rh_entorhinal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.002, p = 0.044 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.388, p = 0.001
rh_fusiform_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 1.42,p = 0.036 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.588, p = 0.004
rh_inferiorparietal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.151, p = 0.020 HV > SCZ t (27.0) = 3.796, p = 0.002
BD > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.683, p <0.001
rh_inferiortemporal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.562, p = 0.004 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.917, p <0.001
rh_lateralorbitofrontal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.598, p = 0.006 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.227, p = 0.001
BD > SCZ t (27.0) = 3.08,p = 0.014
rh_medialorbitofrontal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.005, p = 0.025 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.236, p = 0.010
rh_precuneus_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.372, p = 0.005 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 4.177, p = 0.001
rh_superiorfrontal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.705, p = 0.006 HV > SCZ t (27.0) = 4.24, p = 0.001
BD > SCZ t (25.0) = 3.372, p = 0.007
rh_supramarginal_volume F (2.0, 36.0) = 0.017, p = 0.017 HV > SCZ t (25.0) = 5.021, p <0.001

Results from ANOVA (including genotype) and post-hoc t-test are presented. All significant differences were consistent with the BD > HV > SCZ relationship.