Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 22;23:e60. doi: 10.1017/S1463423622000470

Table 1.

Linear multilevel regression analysis of task shifting in general practice (Ncountries = 34; nGPs = 6,257)

Empty model Model 1: GP and
practice variables
Model 2: + country variables
(one-by-one) a
Fixed effects
Intercept 2.661 (0.178) 2.654 (0.125) 2.655 (0.094)
GP/practice level
Use of EHR applications 0.081 (0.008)*** 0.080 (0.008)***
GPs’ age 0.006 (0.002)*** 0.006 (0.002)***
Hours worked by GPs −0.003 (0.001)** −0.003 (0.001)**
Support staff (Y/N) 0.464 (0.020)*** 0.461 (0.020)***
Other professionals (Y/N) −0.010 (0.013) −0.010 (0.013)
Practice location (ref. big city)
- Suburbs 0.137 (0.048)*** 0.137 (0.048)***
- Small towns 0.198 (0.041)*** 0.200 (0.041)***
- Mixed urban–rural 0.080 (0.045) 0.081 (0.045)
- Rural 0.103 (0.046)** 0.104 (0.046)**
Proportion elderly −0.019 (0.021) −0.019 (0.021)
Proportion ethnic minority −0.027 (0.021) −0.027 (0.021)
Proportion deprived 0.092 (0.022)*** 0.092 (0.022)***
Country level
Average working hours GPs −0.063 (0.029)**
% No support staff available −0.045 (0.008)***
Increase population ≥65 0.058 (0.085)
GP shortage (1 = no shortage – 3 = nationwide shortage) b 0.157 (0.123)
GPs over 60 years −0.011 (0.015)
Nurse prescribing (1 = no prescription rights – 3 = prescription rights) 0.249 (0.150)*
Professionalisation scale c 0.068 (0.051)
Random effects
GP/practice variance 1.360 (0.024) 1.207 (0.022) 1.207 (0.022)
Country variance 1.065 (0.261) 0.526 (0.130) 0.292 (0.073)
ICC 43.9 30.3 19.5

*P < 0.10; **P < 0.05; ***P < 0.01.

a

Coefficients of GP/practice-level variables and random effects taken from model 3 with the percentage of practices without support as independent variable at country level.

b

No information for Ireland, Luxembourg and Canada.

c

No information for Malta.