TABLE 1.
First author | Year | Country | N | Age | Samples | eGFR | sKlotho level | Klotho and eGFR | NOS |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Desbiens | 2022 | Canada | 159 non-CKD | 53 (46–60) | Plasma | 90 | 677 (565–877) ▲ | Similar levels of sKlotho between the two groups. | 6 stars |
153 CKD | 64 (59–67) | 55 | 662 (543–831) | ||||||
Bob | 2018 | Romania | 63 DKD | 58.13 ± 12 | Serum | 65.2 ± 32.5 | 326.36 ± 246.78 ▲ | sKlotho level did not correlate with eGFR | 6 stars |
Scholze | 2014 | Denmark | 24 CKD | 68 (59–75) | Serum | 31 (21–55) | 236 (193–291) ▲ | sKlotho concentrations did not differ among CKD stages | |
Sari | 2017 | Turkey | 76 ADPKD | 50.96 ± 15.59 | Serum | 57.24 ± 33.80 | 2.92 (0.99–21.97) ★ | sKlotho levels were negatively correlated with eGFR | 4 stars |
32 controls | 49.53 ± 7.32 | 90.15 ± 20.71 | 2.04 (0.95–19.98) | ||||||
Hage | 2014 | France | 60 CKD | 46.7 6 ± 16.6 | Serum | 71.1 ± 29.2 | 478 (348–658) ▲ | sKlotho is not related to kidney function | |
Devaraj | 2012 | United States | 61 CKD | 55 ± 17 | Serum | CKD1 or CKD3 | 67 (43, 119) vs108 (66, 182) ★ | sKlotho was increased in CKD and was decreased in diabetics | 4 stars |
82 diabetics | 37 ± 12 | Normal eGFR | 81 (45, 141) vs 35 (15, 58) ★ | ||||||
Seiler | 2013 | Germany | 321 CKD | 65.5 ± 12.1 | Plasma | 43.8 ± 15.6 | 538 (450–666) ▲ | sKlotho level not differ across CKD stages. | 8 stars |
Akimoto | 2012 | Japan | 131 CKD | 56 ± 18 | Serum | 46.3 ± 37.5 | 759.7 (579.5–1,069.1) ▲ | Urinary excreted Klotho, not serum Klotho levels associated with eGFR | 5 stars |
CKD, chronic kidney disease; N, number; DKD, diabetic kidney disease; ▲, pg/ml; ★, ng/ml; ADPKD, autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; NOS, Newcastle–Ottawa scale