Table 2.
Respondent and characteristics | Value | ||
Medical staff (n=39) | |||
|
Age (years), mean (SD) | 39.67 (6.98) | |
|
Institution level, n (%) | ||
|
|
Municipal eye disease control center | 1 (2.56) |
|
|
District-level eye disease control center | 15 (38.46)a |
|
|
Community health service center | 23 (58.97) |
|
Position, n (%) | ||
|
|
Institution leader | 7 (17.95) |
|
|
Department leader | 22 (56.41) |
|
|
Eye disease screening mainstay | 10 (25.64) |
|
Years in the current position, mean (SD) | 6.73 (5.76) | |
Resident (n=318) | |||
|
Age (years), mean (SD) | 68.62 (6.96) | |
|
Sex, n (%) | ||
|
|
Male | 120 (37.74) |
|
|
Female | 198 (62.26) |
|
Education level, n (%) | ||
|
|
Junior high school and below | 216 (67.92) |
|
|
Senior high school | 72 (22.64) |
|
|
Junior college | 21 (6.6) |
|
|
Undergraduate and above | 9 (2.83) |
|
Eye disease, n (%) | ||
|
|
Suspected | 73 (22.96) |
|
|
None | 245 (77.04) |
aOne respondent from a district-level eye disease control center quit the experiment because of temporary work arrangements. Therefore, although 16 district-level eye disease control centers were included in our study, only 15 key persons from these institutions finished the questionnaire.