Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;371:492–499. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2022.09.079

Table 3.

Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard analyses for the prediction of the combined outcome using different combinations of clinical and echocardiographic risk factors.

Variable Univariate analysis
(HR)
Multivariate analysis
(HR)
Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002
χ2 for model 13.7
P-value for model 0.0002
AIC 578.1



Composite outcome- Echocardiography alone
LV mass index, gram/m2 1.01 (1.00–1.03); p = 0.01 NS
LA volume index, ml/m2 1.03 (1.01–1.05); p = 0.002 NS
E/e′ 1.07 (1.03–1.10); p = 0.001 1.05 (1.007–1.09); p = 0.01
RA pressure, mmHg 1.10 (1.03–1.18); p = 0.009 NS
PAT, msec 0.97 (0.96–0.98); p < 0.0001 0.98 (0.97–1.00); p = 0.05
TAPSE 0.26 (0.15–0.47); p < 0.0001 0.40 (0.21–0.76); p = 0.005
χ2 for model 27.8
P-value for model <0.0001
AIC 451.0
P-value for LogLik 0.0001



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 2.41 (0.89–8.5); p = 0.08
E/e′ 1.07 (1.03–1.10); p = 0.001 1.04 (1.00–1.09); p = 0.05
PAT 0.97 (0.96–0.98); p < 0.0001 NS
TAPSE 0.26 (0.15–0.47); p < 0.0001 0.43 (0.23–0.81); p = 0.009
χ2 for model 30.9
P-value for model <0.0001
AIC 450.0
P-value for LogLik 0.005



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor and E/e′
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 3.36 (1.28–11.5); p = 0.02
E/e′ > 8 2.47 (1.42–4.3); p = 0.001 1.80 (1.01–3.26); p = 0.04
χ2 for model 17.9
P-value for model 0.0002
AIC 537.1
P-value for LogLik 0.05



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor and PAT
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 3.35 (1.34–11.2); p = 0.0004
PAT <90 msec 6.8 (3.0–19.8); p < 0.0001 5.4 (2.3–15.6); p < 0.0001
χ2 for model 34.2
P-value for model <0.0001
AIC 512.1
P-value for LogLik <0.0001



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor and TAPSE
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 3.08 (1.22–10.3); p = 0.03
TAPSE <1.8 cm 3.7 (2.0–6.7); p < 0.0001
χ2 for model 27.9
P-value for model <0.0001
AIC 481.3
P-value for LogLik 0.001



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor and Troponin
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 3.79 (0.04–0.86); p = 0.02
Troponin, ng/L 1.06 (1.01–1.09); p = 0.01 1.08 (1.03–1.12); p = 0.004
χ2 for model no Troponin 3.1
AIC model no Troponin 495
χ2 for the entire model 11.2
P-value for model 0.003
AIC 489.2
P-value for LogLik 0.005



Composite outcome- ≥ 1 risk factor and BNP
≥1 clinical risk factor for deterioration 4.68 (1.91–15.4); p = 0.0002 2.34 (0.93–7.8); p = 0.07
BNP, pg/mL 1.006 (1.002–1.009); p = 0.005 1.006 (1.001–1.009); p = 0.008
χ2 for model no BNP 4.3
AIC model no BNP 405.7
χ2 for the entire model 11.2
P-value for model 0.003
AIC 400.8
P-value for LogLik 0.01

Abbreviations - HR, hazard ratio; AIC, Akaike information criterion; LV, left ventricular; LA, left atrial; NS, non-significant; RA, right atrial; PAT, pulmonary acceleration time; TAPSE, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion; Loglik, log-likelihood.