Table 2. 2D-LCs between the {10.4}Cc and the {010}Bss pinacoid.
Cases 2, 3a and 3b are discussed in the supporting information as their bassanite lattice vectors are not parallel to the (10.4)Cc PBCs, as in case 2. Area misfit is too large, as in cases 3a and 3b. Cases 4a and 4b, which intrinsically differ from each other, reproduce near-identical 2D-LCs.
| Ranking | {10.4}Cc lattice vectors (Å) | {010}Bss lattice vectors (Å) | Maximum linear and area misfit (Δ%) | Obliquity (°) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 1/3[441] = 12.85 | [100] = 12.032 | −6.84 | 2D twin law axis [101]Bss | |
| −2/3[421] = 16.206 | [101] = 17.5145 | +7.82 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 161.72 (4×) | 152.46 (1×) | −6.07 | 4.44 | Opposite misfits |
| Case 2 | 1/3[4.17.1] = 26.231 | 2[001] = 25.342 | −3.50 | ||
| −2/3[451] = 19.137 | [101] = 17.5145 | −9.26 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 323.44 (8×) | 304.91 (2×) | −6.07 | 3.00 | Coherent misfits |
| Case 3a | −2/3[441] = 25.7 | [201] = 27.196 | +5.82 | ||
| −1/3[4.11.1] = 17.021 | −[101] = 17.5145 | +2.90 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 404.31 (10×) | 457.37 (3×) | +13.12 | 6.62 | Coherent misfits |
| Case 3b | 1/3[4.19.1] = 35.855 | 3[100] = 36.096 | +0.67 | ||
| 1/3[4.11.1] = 17.021 | −[101] = 17.5145 | +2.90 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 404.31 (10×) | 457.37 (3×) | +13.12 | 4.99 | Coherent misfits |
| Case 4a | 5[010] = 24.948 | 2[100] = 24.064 | −3.67 | 2D twin law axis [100]Bss | |
| [421] = 24.309 | 2[001] = 25.342 | +4.25 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 606.46 (15×) | 609.83 (4×) | +0.76 | 0 | Opposite misfits |
| Case 4b | [421] = 24. 309 | 2[100] = 24.064 | −31.02 | 2D twin law axis [001]Bss | |
| 5[010] = 24.948 | 2[001] = 25.342 | +1.79 | |||
| 2D cell area (Å2) and multiplicity | 606.46 (15×) | 609.83 (4×) | +0.76 | 0 | Opposite misfits |