Table 2.
Protection against a lethal ECTV challenge when a combination of Dryvax (DVX) and BCV are given as pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis to A-strain mice.a Mice were administered Dryvax (2.5 × 105 PFU/mouse) and co-administered an initial dose of BCV (or vehicle) via oral gavage at 10 mg/kg on T = −4, 0, 2, or 4 days followed by 2.5 mg/kg doses of BCV given on Days 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, and 14 following the initial dose. At T = 0 days, mice were challenged via the IN route with 40 PFU (20× LD50) of ECTV.
Group | # of mice | Vaccine |
Antiviral |
Treatment (T=, day) | ECTV | Day of Death (rtc)b | MTD ± SEMb | Mortality (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXb | Veh | BCVb | Veh | |||||||
1 | 10 | + | + | −4 | + | 7,7,8,8,8,9,9,10,10,10 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 100 | ||
2 | 10 | + | + | −4 | + | 42 | 42 | 10⁎ | ||
3 | 10 | + | + | −4 | + | 0⁎ | ||||
4 | 10 | + | + | −4 | + | 26,27 | 26.5 ± 0.5⁎ | 20⁎ | ||
5 | 10 | + | + | 0 | + | 8,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,9,13 | 8.6 ± 0.5 | 100 | ||
6 | 10 | + | + | 0 | + | 0⁎ | ||||
7 | 10 | + | + | 0 | + | 53,15 | 34 ± 19⁎ | 20⁎ | ||
8 | 10 | + | + | 2 | + | 7,7,8,8,8,8,8,8,9,9, | 8 ± 0.2 | 100 | ||
9 | 10 | + | + | 2 | + | 9,10,10,10,10 | 9.8 ± 0.2⁎ | 50⁎ | ||
10 | 10 | + | + | 2 | + | 0⁎ | ||||
11 | 10 | + | + | 4 | + | 7,7,8,8,8,8,8,8,8,9 | 7.9 ± 0.2 | 100 | ||
12 | 10 | + | + | 4 | + | 10,10,12,12,12,14,15,29 | 14.3 ± 2.2⁎ | 80 | ||
13 | 10 | + | + | 4 | + | 9,11,11,11,12,12,13,20 | 12.4 ± 1.2⁎ | 80 | ||
14 | 10 | + | + | 0 | − | 0⁎ | ||||
15 | 10 | + | + | 0 | − | 0⁎ | ||||
16 | 10 | + | + | 0 | − | 0⁎ | ||||
17 | 10 | + | + | 0 | − | 0⁎ | ||||
18 | 5 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0⁎ |
P < 0.05 compared to controls.
Protocol is described in the legend of Fig. 4.
DVX, Dryvax; BCV, Brincidofovir; MTD, mean time to death; SEM, standard error of mean; rtc, relative to challenge.