Skip to main content
. 2022 Aug 1;276(5):868–874. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005637

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

HepatoPredict 2-step algorithm. A, First algorithm identifies good prognosis patients with a PPV=94% (Class I); the remaining patients go through a second algorithm that identifies further good prognosis patients at a PPV=88,5% (Class II). For the remaining patients HepatoPredict does not predict any benefit in liver transplantation. B, Patients proposed for transplantation and their outcome after 5 years according to HepatoPredict Class I and Class I+II versus Milan Criteria (Milan) or UCSF Criteria (UCSF); a positive outcome (No relapse) represented in light blue versus a negative outcome (Relapsed) in red. B, Overlap of transplanted patients that did not relapse (darker blue) with a positive prognosis according to HepatoPredict Class I or Class I+II (light blue), Milan or UCSF criteria (light gray).