Table 6.
Experimental results for Rotten Tomatoes movies and critic review data.
| Method | Principle | Sentiment correct classification rates (normalized) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Negative sentiment | Positive sentiment | Overall | ||
| Logistic regression | TFIDF | 0.89 | 0.68 | 0.82 |
| Cost sensitive logistic regression | TFIDF | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| Support vector machine | TFIDF | 0.88 | 0.70 | 0.81 |
| Naive Bayes | TFIDF | 0.94 | 0.50 | 0.78 |
| Logistic regression | Count vect | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.81 |
| Cost sensitive logistic regression | Count vect | 0.81 | 0.80 | 0.81 |
| Support vector machine | Count vect | 0.88 | 0.69 | 0.81 |
| Naive Bayes | Count vect | 0.85 | 0.72 | 0.80 |
| Vanilla LSTM | Deep learning | 0.84 | 0.73 | 0.77 |
| Stacked LSTM | Deep learning | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| Bi-directional LSTM | Deep learning | 0.85 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| GRU | Deep learning | 0.83 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| Stacked GRU | Deep learning | 0.84 | 0.74 | 0.77 |
| CNN-LSTM | Deep learning | 0.79 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| GRU-CNN | Deep learning | 0.78 | 0.74 | 0.76 |
| Proposed ensemble fuzzy method | Ensemble | 0.83 | 0.83 | 0.83 |