Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 22;54(10):1466–1469. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01178-w

Fig. 2. Performance of SAIGE-GENE+ in UKBB WES data.

Fig. 2

a, Computation time and memory of the gene-based tests (Step 2; Methods) in SAIGE-GENE and SAIGE-GENE+ for four genes with different numbers of variants. The SKAT-O tests were conducted with three maximum MAF cutoffs (1%, 0.1% and 0.01%) and three variant annotations (LoF only, LoF+missense and LoF+missense+synonymous) and combined using the Cauchy combination or minimum P value approach. Plots are in the log10 –log10 scale. Details of the numbers and genes are presented in Supplementary Table 1. b, Most significant variant sets across the three different MAF cutoffs (1%, 0.1% and 0.01%) and three functional annotations (LoF (L) only, LoF+missense (M+L) and LoF+missense+synonymous (S+M+L)). Distribution of variant sets with the smallest P values among 551 significant gene–phenotype associations identified by SAIGE-GENE+ in the analyses of 30 quantitative traits and 141 binary traits in the UKBB WES data.