Table 7.

Comparison of tri-hybrid nanofluid, hybrid nanofluid, and nanofluid.

$\alpha$	$\beta$	Ha	Tri-hybrid nanofluid ${\text{Fe}}_3{\text{O}}_4-{\text{Al}}_2{\text{O}}_3-{\text{TiO}}_2/{\text{H}}_2\text{O}$			Hybrid nanofluid ${\text{Fe}}_3{\text{O}}_4-{\text{TiO}}_2/{\text{H}}_2\text{O}$		Nanofluid ${\text{TiO}}_2/{\text{H}}_2\text{O}$
			The volume fraction of particles	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for injection case	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for suction case	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for injection case	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for suction case	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for injection case	$N_u\left|{}_{\eta =-1}\right)$ for suction case
− 2	0.2	1	2%	9.9240	5.0465	9.0900	4.5755	9.0775	4.5533
− 0.5				4.0747	1.3614	3.6684	1.1646	3.6389	1.1313
0.5				1.7113	0.4405	1.4825	0.3526	1.4472	0.3331
2				0.3234	0.0645	0.2543	0.0459	0.2382	0.0413
− 0.5	0.2			4.0747	1.3614	3.6684	1.1646	3.6389	1.1313
	0.4			4.1105	1.3505	3.7027	1.1548	3.6734	1.1216
	0.7			4.1470	1.3398	3.7377	1.1450	3.7084	1.1120
	0.2	1		4.1716	1.3328	3.6684	1.1646	3.6389	1.1313
		2		4.0829	1.3587	3.6766	1.1621	3.6479	1.1287
		4		4.0789	1.3597	3.6925	1.1573	3.6652	1.1235
		6		4.1141	1.3488	3.7076	1.1527	3.6817	1.1186
− 0.5	0.2	1	3%	4.1035	1.4021	3.7022	1.1985	3.6787	1.1643
			4%	4.1288	1.4434	3.7353	1.2330	3.71980	1.1979
			5%	4.1537	1.4854	3.7678	1.2683	3.7569	1.2321
			6%	4.1774	1.5279	3.7998	1.3043	3.7954	1.2670