Skip to main content
. 2022 Apr 6;55(1):364–416. doi: 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8

Table 3.

Studies of eye-tracker mean latencies. While measurement type 1 compares the duration from an eye movement starts until a change in gaze coordinate, measurements 2–5 include the time needed to update the monitor in a gaze-contingent setup. Numbers in brackets denote standard deviations

Type of latency measurement Eye tracker Mean latency Reference
1: Compare raw data file against video of participant eye TX300 20.3–24.1ms Leppänen et al., (2015)
TX60XL 44.5ms (7.3) Morgante et al., (2012)
Timing of gaze data vs network hub time T120 33ms (8.9) Creel (2012)
Comparisons of VOG against EOG-system baseline Five VR-eye trackers 45–81ms Stein et al., (2021)
2: Artificial eye with diodes until display change EL1000, screen 160 Hz 4.82ms (1.86) Reingold (2014)
EL1000, screen 60 Hz 9.69ms (4.79) Reingold (2014)
Artificial eye with diodes / constituent latencies ELII 10.5ms (0.7) Bernard et al., (2007)
3: High-speed camera films eye and monitor through mirror T1750 27ms Shukla et al., (2011)
4: Blinding the eye tracker + high-speed camera EL1000 12–40ms Saunders and Woods (2014)
5: Measure display changes against saccade onset EL1000 10ms Hohenstein and Kliegl (2014)