. 2021 Mar 23;74(3):314–321. doi: 10.1007/s12070-021-02516-w

Table 3.

Dizzines handicap inventory (Dhi) score improvement At Basal and 2nd visit follow up

	Brandt-Daroff group (n = 9)	“Sham” group (n = 7)	Semont group (n = 9)	Epley group (n = 9)	p Value^&
Basal DHI (n = 34)	56.88	41.71	47.11	63.11	0.334
2nd visit DHI (n = 28)	35.71	33.66	32.44	1.33	0.116
Improvement (difference between 2nd visit and basal DHI score, %)	− 21.17, 37.21%	− 8.05, 19.29%	− 14.67, 31.13%	− 61.78, 97.89%	< 0.001

Brandt-Daroff group (n = 9)

“Sham” group (n = 7)

Semont group (n = 9)

Epley group (n = 9)

p Value^&

Basal DHI

(n = 34)

56.88

41.71

47.11

63.11

0.334

2nd visit DHI (n = 28)

35.71

33.66

32.44

1.33

0.116

Improvement

(difference between 2nd visit and basal DHI score, %)

− 21.17, 37.21%

− 8.05, 19.29%

− 14.67, 31.13%

− 61.78, 97.89%

< 0.001

^&ANOVA Analysis (Analysis of variance). DHI: Dizziness Handicap Inventory