Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 5;12(10):e067812. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-067812

Table 2.

Inclusion and exclusion criteria

Include if study involves Exclude if study involves
Women
  • Including cis and trans women

  • Also include if sex/gender is not specified


Adults aged 18 and older
One or more of the following diagnoses:
  • Heart disease

  • Ischaemic heart disease

  • Coronary heart disease

  • Coronary artery disease

  • Acute coronary syndrome

  • Myocardial infarction

  • Unstable angina

  • MINOCA (myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries)

  • Spontaneous coronary artery dissection

  • Microvascular coronary disease

  • Coronary artery spasm

  • Coronary embolism

  • Kounis syndrome

  • Congestive heart failure

    • Cardiomyopathy

    • HFrEF (heart failure with reduced ejection fraction)

    • HFpEF

    • Takotsubo syndrome

  • Stroke or Cerebrovascular accident


A support intervention led by a peer(s)
  • Could be

    • Individual (1:1) support or group programmes

    • Virtual/online programmes

    • The provision of emotional, appraisal and/or informational assistance

Men only
Exclusively the following diagnoses (if none of the inclusion diagnoses on the left are also present):
  • Peripheral arterial disease

  • Peripheral vascular disease

  • Heart valve diseases

    • Stenosis

    • Regurgitation/leaky valve

  • Arrhythmias

    • Atrial fibrillation

    • Atrial flutter

    • Supraventricular tachycardia

    • Palpitations

  • Hypertension

  • Risk factors for cardiovascular disease (eg, physical inactivity or sedentary lifestyle, smoking, depression), but no diagnosis of a cardiovascular disease


Support programmes led by healthcare professionals, and not peers with lived experience
Informal social support from family, friends, or caregivers, and not peers with lived experience
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses, scoping reviews (these types of studies should be flagged and documented in a group Google doc for reference)
Descriptive or qualitative papers presenting general principles, frameworks, conceptual models or qualities of peer support, but that do not evaluate a peer support intervention(s), specifically (these types of studies might be useful to flag in our Google doc as reference papers)