Table 1.

Components of RE-AIM evaluation framework

Construct and definition applied for this study	Questions addressed	Data sources used
Reach The number and proportion of people who participated in the Co-LEC	1. How many people participated in an initial assessment at the Co-LEC compared to how many people received treatment at GenesisCare? 2. How many people participated in an in an initial assessment at the Co-LEC compared to the capacity of the service? 3. Why did people decline participation in the Co-LEC?	Co-LEC records Routinely collected GenesisCare data
Effectiveness The performance of the Co-LEC workflow in practice	4. Did the workflow perform as intended? If not, why?	Billing records Co-LEC records Exercise working group notes Patient satisfaction surveys
Adoption The number and proportion of key staff who participated in the Co-LEC workflow	5. How many oncologists participated in referrals to the exercise clinic? 6. What proportion of participants overall were referred by each practitioner? 7. Did the supporting staff execute the workflow as expected? If not, why?	Co-LEC records Exercise working group notes
Implementation Adaptations made to Co-LEC workflow or its supporting functions	8. What adaptations were made to the Co-LEC workflow or its supporting functions?	Co-LEC records Exercise working group notes
Maintenance The extent to which the program became part of routine organisational practices	9. Did the Co-LEC become institutionalised as part of routine organisational practices?	Exercise working group notes

Abbreviations: Co-LEC Co-located exercise clinic, RE-AIM Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance