Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Oct 6.
Published in final edited form as: Pharmacogenomics J. 2016 Nov 29;17(6):535–542. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2016.56

Table 1. Summary of studies eligible for meta analysis, grouped by study methodology.

Author Year Region Study Methodology N Intent of Therapy Other Chemotherapy KRAS Status Reported Outcomes

Saridaki 22 2014 Belgium, France, USA mixed 559 mixed mixed unselected response, PFS, OS

Loupakis 23 2014 California prospective cohort 113 mixed irinotecan wild-type response, PFS, OS
Garm Spindler 24 2009 Denmark prospective cohort 71 salvage irinotecan unselected response, PFS, OS
Graziano 25 2008 Italy prospective cohort 110 salvage irinotecan unselected response, PFS, OS
Inoue 26 2014 Japan prospective cohort 57 salvage mixed wild-type response, PFS, OS

Sclafani 27 2014 response, PFS, OS prospective cohort within Phase II trial 105 adjuvant capecitabine, oxaliplatin wild-type response, PFS, OS
Etienne-Grimaldi 28 2012 France prospective cohort
within Phase II trial
52 first-line irinotecan,
folinic acid, UFT
unselected response, OS
Lurje 29 2008 California prospective cohort within Phase II trial 130 salvage none unselected response, PFS, OS
Zhang 30 2010 California prospective cohort within Phase II trial 65 salvage mixed unselected response, TTP, OS
Zhang 31 2011 California prospective cohort within Phase II trial 111 salvage none unselected response, PFS, OS
Kjersem 32 2012 Norway prospective cohort within RCT 180 first-line oxalplatin,
folinic acid, UFT
unselected response, PFS, OS
Kjersem 19 2014 Norway prospective cohort within RCT 504 first-line oxalplatin, folinic acid, UFT unselected response, PFS, OS

Jonker 2 2015 Canada &
Australia
prospective cohort within RCT 138 salvage none unselected response, OS

Hsieh 33 2012 Taiwan retrospective cohort 118 first-line oxalplatin,
folinic acid, UFT
wild-type response, PFS, OS
Negri 34 2014 Italy retrospective cohort 86 mixed mixed unselected response, TTP, OS
Calemma 35 2012 Italy retrospective cohort 50 mixedC/P mixed wild-type response, PFS, OS
Hu-Lieskovan 36 2011 Europe retrospective cohort 130 neoadjuvantLA mixed unselected pathologic response
Bibeau 37 2009 France retrospective cohort 69 salvage irinotecan unselected response, PFS, OS
Dahan 38 2011 France retrospective cohort 58 salvage irinotecan unselected response, TTP, DSS
Park 39 2012 Korean retrospective cohort 118 salvage mixed unselected response, PFS, OS
Paez 40 2010 Caucasian retrospective cohort 104 salvageC/P mixed unselected response, PFS
Sebio 41 2013 Spain retrospective cohort 100 salvageC/P mixed wild-type response
Geva 18 2015 Europe
(multicenter)
retrospective cohort 740 salvage mixed wild-type response, PFS, OS, DCR

N = number participants; UFT = Tegafur/uracil; PFS = progression free survival; OS = overall survival; TTP = time to progression; DSS = disease free survival; LA = patients had locally advanced disease; C/P = patients received either cetuximab and panitumumab