Table 1. Summary of studies eligible for meta analysis, grouped by study methodology.
Author | Year | Region | Study Methodology | N | Intent of Therapy | Other Chemotherapy | KRAS Status | Reported Outcomes |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ||||||||
Saridaki 22 | 2014 | Belgium, France, USA | mixed | 559 | mixed | mixed | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
| ||||||||
Loupakis 23 | 2014 | California | prospective cohort | 113 | mixed | irinotecan | wild-type | response, PFS, OS |
Garm Spindler 24 | 2009 | Denmark | prospective cohort | 71 | salvage | irinotecan | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Graziano 25 | 2008 | Italy | prospective cohort | 110 | salvage | irinotecan | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Inoue 26 | 2014 | Japan | prospective cohort | 57 | salvage | mixed | wild-type | response, PFS, OS |
| ||||||||
Sclafani 27 | 2014 | response, PFS, OS | prospective cohort within Phase II trial | 105 | adjuvant | capecitabine, oxaliplatin | wild-type | response, PFS, OS |
Etienne-Grimaldi 28 | 2012 | France | prospective cohort within Phase II trial |
52 | first-line | irinotecan, folinic acid, UFT |
unselected | response, OS |
Lurje 29 | 2008 | California | prospective cohort within Phase II trial | 130 | salvage | none | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Zhang 30 | 2010 | California | prospective cohort within Phase II trial | 65 | salvage | mixed | unselected | response, TTP, OS |
Zhang 31 | 2011 | California | prospective cohort within Phase II trial | 111 | salvage | none | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Kjersem 32 | 2012 | Norway | prospective cohort within RCT | 180 | first-line | oxalplatin, folinic acid, UFT |
unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Kjersem 19 | 2014 | Norway | prospective cohort within RCT | 504 | first-line | oxalplatin, folinic acid, UFT | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
| ||||||||
Jonker 2 | 2015 | Canada & Australia |
prospective cohort within RCT | 138 | salvage | none | unselected | response, OS |
| ||||||||
Hsieh 33 | 2012 | Taiwan | retrospective cohort | 118 | first-line | oxalplatin, folinic acid, UFT |
wild-type | response, PFS, OS |
Negri 34 | 2014 | Italy | retrospective cohort | 86 | mixed | mixed | unselected | response, TTP, OS |
Calemma 35 | 2012 | Italy | retrospective cohort | 50 | mixedC/P | mixed | wild-type | response, PFS, OS |
Hu-Lieskovan 36 | 2011 | Europe | retrospective cohort | 130 | neoadjuvantLA | mixed | unselected | pathologic response |
Bibeau 37 | 2009 | France | retrospective cohort | 69 | salvage | irinotecan | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Dahan 38 | 2011 | France | retrospective cohort | 58 | salvage | irinotecan | unselected | response, TTP, DSS |
Park 39 | 2012 | Korean | retrospective cohort | 118 | salvage | mixed | unselected | response, PFS, OS |
Paez 40 | 2010 | Caucasian | retrospective cohort | 104 | salvageC/P | mixed | unselected | response, PFS |
Sebio 41 | 2013 | Spain | retrospective cohort | 100 | salvageC/P | mixed | wild-type | response |
Geva 18 | 2015 | Europe (multicenter) |
retrospective cohort | 740 | salvage | mixed | wild-type | response, PFS, OS, DCR |
N = number participants; UFT = Tegafur/uracil; PFS = progression free survival; OS = overall survival; TTP = time to progression; DSS = disease free survival; LA = patients had locally advanced disease; C/P = patients received either cetuximab and panitumumab