Skip to main content
. 2022 Sep 13;56(19):13709–13718. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.2c02648

Table 1. Contribution Rates of the 13 Compounds to the hTR-Agonist Activities in Site1 (%)a.

(%) Jun. Jul. Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov.
TRIAC 61 87 102 60 123 96
TETRAC - - - - - -
GC-1 - - 3.5 × 10–2 - - -
T3 3.3 × 10–3 1.5 × 10–2 1.5 × 10–2 4.2 × 10–3 2.3 × 10–2 -
T4 - - - - - -
DITPA - - - - - -
3-Cl-T3 - 8.8 × 10–3 - - - -
rT3 - 3.7 × 10–3 1.8 × 10–3 2.4 × 10–3 2.6 × 10–3 -
acetyl T4 - - - - - -
T1 3.2 × 10–3 3.1 × 10–3 4.7 × 10–4 1.0 × 10–6 4.7 × 10–4 1.6 × 10–4
TCBPA 4.9 × 10–4 5.1 × 10–4 7.4 × 10–4 4.3 × 10–4 5.3 × 10–4 4.0 × 10–4
TBBPA 1.1 × 10–4 1.2 × 10–4 1.9 × 10–4 1.2 × 10–4 1.4 × 10–4 2.1 × 10–4
triclabendazole 7.5 × 10–7 3.5 × 10–5 2.2 × 10–5 7.5 × 10–7 3.2 × 10–5 -
TCRs 61 87 102 60 123 96
(%) Dec. Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May
TRIAC 148 92 116 136 106 79
TETRAC - - - - - -
GC-1 - - - - - -
T3 - 1.2 × 10–2 1.6 × 10–2 - - 0.18
T4 - 1.2 × 10–2 - - - 3.8 × 10–2
DITPA - - - - - -
3-Cl-T3 6.1 × 10–2 1.5 × 10–2 - - 6.4 × 10–2 -
rT3 3.9 × 10–3 5.8 × 10–3 8.4 × 10–3 - 6.9 × 10–3 -
acetyl T4 - - - - - -
T1 3.5 × 10–3 - 2.6 × 10–3 1.9 × 10–3 2.8 × 10–3 -
TCBPA 5.5 × 10–4 4.5 × 10–4 8.6 × 10–4 - 8.6 × 10–4 2.2 × 10–4
TBBPA 3.0 × 10–4 1.8 × 10–4 1.5 × 10–4 9.7 × 10–5 9.1 × 10–5 7.7 × 10–5
triclabendazole - - - 5.4 × 10–6 3.8 × 10–6 -
TCRs 148 92 116 136 106 79
a

All values indicate the contribution rate of each compound to the hTR-agonist activity in the STP effluents by the TR yeast cell assay. Hyphen means not detected by LC–MS/MS, and the maximum contribution rates calculated from LOQ (%) are given below: TRIAC = 0.43, TETRAC = 0.25, GC-1 = 6.9 × 10–2, T3 = 2.1 × 10–3, T4 = 2.1 × 10–3, DITPA = 7.9 × 10–4, 3-Cl-T3 = 1.2 × 10–3, rT3 = 6.7 × 10–4, acetyl T4 = 2.0 × 10–4, T1 = 2.6 × 10–5, TCBPA = 1.3 × 10–5, TBBPA = 8.9 × 10–6, and triclabendazole = 5.2 × 10–7. All values are represented as the mean of three replicates (n = 3). The concentrations in the STP effluents quantified by LC–MS/MS are shown in Table S6 (ng/L). The hTR-agonist activities in Site1 are shown in Table S8. A comparison with the 13 compound concentrations as T3 equivalent and the hTR-agonist activities is given in Table S9 (ng-T3 eq/L). TCR is the total contribution rate (%). The dose–response and standard curves by the yeast assay and LC–MS/MS, respectively, are shown in Figure S1.