. 2022 Oct 3;10:e14123. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14123

Table 2. Differences in PA frequencies before, during and post lockdown, among sexes and age groups.

		PA pre lockdown		PA lockdown		PA post lockdown		∆ PA (pre-lock)			∆ PA (pre-post)			∆ PA (lock-post)
		No	Yes	No	Yes	No	Yes	χ²	P	RR	χ²	P	RR	χ²	P	RR
Gender	F	176	376	195	357	240	312	2.27	0.15	0.90	34.13	<0.001^*	0.73	16.46	<0.001^*	0.81
	M	49	148	59	138	64	133	2.50	0.15	0.83	8.33	<0.01^*	0.76	0.64	0.52	0.92
Age	18–39	87	196	77	210	100	187	1.47	0.27	1.13	3.45	0.09	0.91	8.67	<0.01^*	0.48
	40–49	49	108	55	102	71	86	0.82	0.45	0.89	14.24	<0.001^*	0.69	6.40	0.01^*	0.77
	50–64	71	174	95	150	104	141	8.23	<0.01^*	0.75	20.55	<0.001^*	0.68	1.65	0.25	0.91
	>64	18	42	27	33	29	31	4.76	<0.05^*	0.67	11.00	0.001^*	0.62	0.33	0.77	0.93
Total		225	524	254	495	304	445	4.23	<0.05^*	0.88	42.46	<0.001^*	0.74	15.43	<0.001^*	0.83

Notes:

Significant level.

pre, before the lockdown; lockdown, during the lockdown; post, after the lockdown; $χ^{2}$ , McNemar $χ^{2}$ ; RR, Risk Ratio; P, Exact McNemar significance probability.