Skip to main content
. 2022 Jan 31;77(10):2032–2039. doi: 10.1093/gerona/glac025

Table 3.

Multinomial Logistic Regression Between Skin Autofluorescence (SAF) as Exposure and Prefrailty and Physical Frailty as Outcomes When Compared to Nonfrail Individuals

Prefrail (N = 1 221 or 48%) Frail (N = 96 or4%) p Value of Interaction
Odds Ratio (95% CI) p Value Odds Ratio (95% CI) p Value
Ref. (nonfrail) Ref. (nonfrail) SAF × sex 0.30
Model 1 1.38 (1.15–1.66) .0004 2.04 (1.34–3.12) .001 SAF × DM 0.60
Model 2 1.29 (1.07–1.56) .007 1.87 (1.20–2.90) .005 SAF × smoking 0.12

Notes: Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, and RS-cohorts. Model 2 was additionally adjusted for eGFR, DM status, smoking status, education level, and BMI. All bold p-values are <.05 denoting significant results.