Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 6;17(10):e0275055. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275055

Table 5. Logistic regression results for financial distress.

Odds ratio 95% Confidence interval P-value
Gender: male vs. female (ref.) 0.974 [0.672, 1.412] 0.888
Age (years) 1.037 [0.987, 1.09] 0.148
Site: Ludwigshafen vs. Heidelberg (ref.) 0.598 [0.374, 0.955] 0.031
Site: Mannheim vs. Heidelberg (ref.) 0.313 [0.191, 0.514] <0.001
Studies: health vs. business (ref.) 0.291 [0.161, 0.523] <0.001
Studies: IT vs. business (ref.) 0.922 [0.558, 1.522] 0.75
Studies: MINT/technical vs. business (ref.) 0.667 [0.369, 1.205] 0.18
Studies: other vs. business (ref.) 1.325 [0.713, 2.462] 0.373
Part-time working vs. no part-time working (ref.) 1.811 [1.225, 2.676] 0.003
Grade: good vs. very good (ref.) 1.037 [0.67, 1.605] 0.871
Grade: average vs. very good (ref.) 1.261 [0.736, 2.159] 0.399
Grade: poor vs. very good (ref.) 2.426 [0.413, 14.237] 0.326
Semester 0.961 [0.875, 1.055] 0.399
Income before (irregular income) vs. no income (ref.) 0.486 [0.184, 1.282] 0.145
Income before (regular income) vs. no income (ref.) 0.456 [0.245, 0.851] 0.014
Degree: master vs. bachelor (ref.) 0.977 [0.582, 1.64] 0.93

IT: Information technologies; MINT: mathematics, informatics, natural sciences and technology