Skip to main content
. 2020 Sep 23;2(4):209–230. doi: 10.36628/ijhf.2020.0029

Table 1. Arterial functional parameters used to describe pulsatile hemodynamics and arterial stiffness.

Measure Advantage Disadvantage Measurement technique Prognostic value for heart failure
Brachial PP Simple Depends on cardiac and arterial function Brachial cuff +++ (direct or inverse)
Central PP The PP “seen” by the heart and central organs Depends on cardiac and arterial function Radial/brachial waveforms (tonometry or cuff), calibrated with brachial BP, and TF → central pressure waveform +
PWA: AIx, AP Physiological rationale Depends on cardiac and arterial function, heart rate, sex, height, etc. Automated analysis of the central pressure waveform +
WSA: Pb, RM Physiological rationale Needs pressure and flow waveforms Automated analysis of the central pressure and flow waveform ++
WIA Physiological rationale Needs pressure and flow waveforms; sensitive to waveform quality Automated analysis of the central pressure and flow waveform
cfPWV Relatively robust measurement Depends on actual BP; determination of travel distance on body surface only an estimate Tonometry, piezo-electronic sensors, cuffs ++
baPWV Relatively robust measurement Depends on actual BP; determination of travel distance is “virtual” Cuffs +

AIx = augmentation Index; AP = augmented pressure; baPWV = brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity; BP = blood pressure; cfPWV = carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity; Pb = amplitude backward wave; PP = pulse pressure; PWA = pulse waveform analysis; RM = reflection magnitude; TF = transfer function; WIA = wave intensity analysis; WSA = wave separation analysis.